SSF2 yielded significantly higher subjective image-quality scores than SSF and no-SSF in both diastolic and systolic phases.
- Study included 50 patients with heart rates above 80 bpm who underwent CCTA between January and June 2023.
- Both end-diastolic (70-80% phase) and end-systolic (40-50% phase) images were evaluated.
- All comparisons reached statistical significance with P<0.001.
- Three reconstruction algorithms were compared: SSF2, SSF, and no motion correction (no-SSF).