The center bridge-type knee orthosis significantly reduced external knee adduction moment during the loading response in patients with knee OA, with values approaching those of healthy individuals, but achieving full normalization of EKAM throughout the stance phase would require a valgus corrective moment at least 5.34 times greater than that produced by the current orthosis.
Key Findings
Results
Wearing the center bridge-type knee orthosis significantly reduced external knee adduction moment (EKAM) during the loading response phase in patients with knee OA compared to the no-orthosis condition.
17 patients with knee OA performed level-ground walking under two conditions: with and without the orthosis in a randomized order.
The analysis focused on the gait stance phase, during which substantial mechanical loading was exerted on the knee joint.
Gait data were obtained using a six-axis force-torque sensor enabling real-time, direct quantification of EKAM.
The reduction in EKAM during the loading response was statistically significant when comparing orthosis versus no-orthosis conditions.
Results
EKAM values in patients wearing the orthosis became comparable to those in healthy participants during both the loading response and pre-swing phases.
18 healthy older individuals were assessed during free walking for comparison.
During the loading response, EKAM values with the orthosis approached those of the healthy control group.
During the pre-swing phase, when the foot prepares to leave the ground, medial knee loading was also close to healthy levels.
No significant differences in EKAM were observed between the orthosis condition and healthy participants during these two phases.
Results
No significant differences in gait parameters were observed between groups or conditions.
Gait parameters assessed included walking speed and stride length.
There were no significant differences in these parameters between patients with knee OA and healthy participants.
There were also no significant differences in gait parameters between the orthosis and no-orthosis conditions in knee OA patients.
This suggests the orthosis did not alter walking mechanics beyond the reduction in medial knee loading.
Discussion
Fully normalizing EKAM throughout the entire stance phase would require a valgus corrective moment at least 5.34 times greater than that produced by the center bridge-type knee orthosis.
The required valgus corrective force was estimated to be approximately five-fold stronger than what the current orthosis generates.
This finding indicates that current orthotic designs may provide insufficient mechanical offloading to fully normalize EKAM.
The authors suggest that further structural refinements are required to enhance valgus correction and achieve more effective reduction of medial knee loading during gait.
These insights are intended to guide the development of future knee orthoses capable of adjusting support dynamically throughout walking.
Results
The center bridge-type knee orthosis provides substantial mechanical support during the early stance phase and continues to reduce medial knee loading during the transition to swing.
The orthosis demonstrated biomechanical effects specifically during the loading response (early stance) and pre-swing (late stance/transition) phases.
EKAM was not fully normalized across all phases of the stance phase with the current orthosis design.
The six-axis force-torque sensor built into the device allowed real-time, direct quantification of the support provided by the orthosis.
The partial normalization observed suggests phase-specific effectiveness of the current orthotic design.
Nakano K, Mine Y, Katsuhira J, Yamauchi K, Kitashiro M, Nomoto S, et al.. (2026). Effect of the Center Bridge-Type Knee Orthosis on the External Knee Adduction Moment During Gait in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis.. Clinical interventions in aging. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S558427