Body Composition

Effects of 12-week supervised combined aerobic and resistance training on body composition and physical function in overweight or obese adults with multiple cardiometabolic risk factors: a randomized trial.

TL;DR

12-week supervised combined aerobic and resistance training was associated with modest improvements in fat-related body composition and selected physical-function outcomes in overweight or obese adults with multiple cardiometabolic risk factors.

Key Findings

The intervention group had significantly greater reductions in whole-body fat mass compared to controls at 12 weeks.

  • Adjusted between-group difference in whole-body fat mass: -1.48 kg (95% CI, -1.85 to -1.11)
  • Holm-adjusted P < 0.001
  • This was a co-primary outcome assessed via baseline-adjusted linear mixed-effects models
  • 52 participants were randomized (planned 2:1 ratio, intervention to control), all completed week 12 assessment

The intervention group showed significantly greater improvement in handgrip strength compared to controls at 12 weeks.

  • Adjusted between-group difference in handgrip strength: 1.16 kg (95% CI, 0.56 to 1.77)
  • Holm-adjusted P < 0.001
  • Handgrip strength was a co-primary outcome
  • Baseline-adjusted linear mixed-effects models were used for estimation

Exploratory secondary analyses suggested improvements across multiple body composition measures.

  • Outcomes with unadjusted P values suggesting improvement included body weight, body mass index, body fat percentage, and trunk fat mass
  • These were exploratory secondary analyses with unadjusted P values, not Holm-corrected
  • Trunk muscle mass did not reach statistical significance
  • Findings are described as preliminary

Exploratory secondary analyses suggested improvements in multiple physical function outcomes.

  • Outcomes with unadjusted P values suggesting improvement included lower-limb explosive power, 4-m gait speed, one-leg standing balance, and sit-and-reach flexibility
  • Whole-body response time did not reach statistical significance
  • These were exploratory secondary analyses with unadjusted P values
  • Analyses used baseline-adjusted linear mixed-effects models

The supervised exercise intervention demonstrated high adherence with no serious adverse events.

  • Mean attendance was 86.7%
  • No serious adverse events were reported
  • All 52 randomized participants completed the week 12 assessment (100% retention)
  • Of 60 individuals screened, 52 were randomized

The exercise intervention consisted of supervised combined aerobic and resistance training three times weekly over 12 weeks.

  • Each session was 60 minutes and included warm-up, aerobic exercise, resistance exercise, and flexibility/cool-down components
  • Intensity was monitored using heart rate, heart-rate reserve, perceived exertion, symptoms, and tolerance
  • Participants were randomized using a computer-generated stratified permuted-block sequence with allocation concealment in a planned 2:1 ratio (intervention to control)
  • Controls maintained usual lifestyle and dietary habits and received weekly telephone follow-up
  • Eligible participants had overweight or obesity plus at least one additional clinically diagnosed cardiometabolic risk factor

Cardiometabolic biomarkers were not reassessed at follow-up, limiting the scope of conclusions.

  • The authors explicitly note that cardiometabolic biomarkers were not reassessed at follow-up
  • Findings are described as preliminary and should be interpreted as such
  • The study was conducted in a single center (hospital-based integrated sports and health service setting)
  • The authors note that evidence from hospital-based integrated sports and health service settings remains limited

What This Means

This research suggests that a structured 12-week exercise program combining aerobic and resistance training can meaningfully reduce body fat and improve muscle strength in overweight or obese adults who also have conditions like high blood pressure, high cholesterol, or other heart-related risk factors. Participants who exercised three times per week for 60 minutes per session lost about 1.5 kg (roughly 3.3 pounds) more body fat and gained about 1.2 kg more handgrip strength compared to those who maintained their usual habits. Attendance was high (about 87% of sessions completed), and no serious injuries or health events occurred, suggesting the program was both feasible and safe in a supervised clinical setting. Beyond the main outcomes, exploratory analyses also hinted at improvements in body weight, BMI, body fat percentage, trunk fat, walking speed, leg power, balance, and flexibility, though these results were not corrected for multiple comparisons and should be considered preliminary. Notably, trunk muscle mass and reaction time did not show statistically significant changes. The study did not re-measure blood sugar, cholesterol, or other cardiometabolic lab values at the end of the program, so it is unknown whether those risk factors also improved. This research suggests that supervised combined exercise programs delivered in hospital or clinical health-service settings are a practical option for people who are overweight or obese and have multiple health risk factors. The modest but statistically significant improvements in fat mass and grip strength support current recommendations for combining aerobic and resistance exercise in this population. Because this was a single-center study with a relatively small sample and no long-term follow-up, larger and longer trials are needed to confirm these findings and determine whether the benefits persist over time.

Check Your Own Numbers

Upload your bloodwork. We'll cross-reference your results against this study and 4,700 others.

Upload Your Labs

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Chen J, Chen J, Mao K, Chen Z, Lin Z. (2026). Effects of 12-week supervised combined aerobic and resistance training on body composition and physical function in overweight or obese adults with multiple cardiometabolic risk factors: a randomized trial.. Frontiers in public health. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1896850