Effects of energy-matched low- versus high-carbohydrate diets on glycaemic control, lipid profile, and body composition in healthy adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Anagnostou A, Larumbe-Zabala E, et al. • European journal of nutrition • 2026
Under energy-matched conditions, low-carbohydrate diets confer modest advantages for glycaemia, HDL-C, and triglycerides, whereas high-carbohydrate diets better lower LDL-C, with most effects not depending on exercise status.
Key Findings
Results
Low-carbohydrate diets produced greater reductions in fasting blood glucose compared with high-carbohydrate diets under energy-matched conditions.
Pooled effect size: Hedges' g = -0.364; 95% CI -0.709 to -0.019; P < 0.001
18 RCTs involving 905 participants were included in the meta-analysis
LC diets were defined as ≤44% of total daily caloric intake from carbohydrate; HC diets as ≥45% TDCI
Random-effects model was used to calculate pooled effect sizes
Studies were identified through systematic searches of PubMed and secondary sources up to April 2025
Results
Low-carbohydrate diets produced greater reductions in fasting insulin compared with high-carbohydrate diets.
Pooled effect size: Hedges' g = -0.190; 95% CI -0.361 to -0.014; P = 0.034
Only non-medicated, disease-free adults were included in eligible studies
Studies were required to compare energy-matched dietary interventions
Effect was considered statistically significant at P = 0.034
Results
Triglycerides decreased significantly more under low-carbohydrate compared with high-carbohydrate diets.
Pooled effect size: Hedges' g = -0.379; 95% CI -0.540 to -0.219; P < 0.001
This was one of the stronger effect sizes observed across all lipid outcomes
Effect was consistent and statistically significant
Results
HDL-cholesterol increased significantly more under low-carbohydrate compared with high-carbohydrate diets.
Pooled effect size: Hedges' g = 0.389; 95% CI 0.229 to 0.550; P < 0.001
This represented the largest statistically significant effect among lipid outcomes
The positive Hedges' g value indicates a favorable increase in HDL-C under LC conditions
Results
High-carbohydrate diets led to greater reductions in LDL-cholesterol compared with low-carbohydrate diets.
Pooled effect size: Hedges' g = -0.225; 95% CI -0.406 to -0.043; P = 0.009
This was the only lipid outcome where HC diets showed a significant advantage over LC diets
No significant between-diet effects were found for total cholesterol
Results
Low-carbohydrate diets reduced body mass to a greater extent than high-carbohydrate diets under energy-matched conditions.
Pooled effect size: Hedges' g = -0.183; 95% CI -0.349 to -0.017; P = 0.031
Effect was statistically significant despite energy-matching between dietary conditions
This finding suggests macronutrient composition influences body mass independent of total caloric intake
Results
Low-carbohydrate diets reduced fat mass to a greater extent than high-carbohydrate diets, with no significant effect on fat-free mass.
Fat mass pooled effect size: Hedges' g = -0.304; 95% CI -0.548 to -0.059; P = 0.015
No significant effect was observed for fat-free mass between LC and HC diets
The differential effect on fat mass without affecting fat-free mass suggests LC diets may preferentially reduce adipose tissue
Results
Most metabolic and anthropometric effects of low- versus high-carbohydrate diets did not depend on exercise status.
The meta-analysis included 18 RCTs with 905 total participants
Exercise status was evaluated as a potential moderator of dietary effects
The authors concluded that evidence can guide carbohydrate intake recommendations 'in diets where total caloric intake remains unchanged'
This finding was noted in both the abstract and conclusions of the paper
Anagnostou A, Larumbe-Zabala E, Fiore J, Roberts J, Naclerio F. (2026). Effects of energy-matched low- versus high-carbohydrate diets on glycaemic control, lipid profile, and body composition in healthy adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.. European journal of nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-025-03862-z