Aging & Longevity

Effects of lifestyle physical activity level on pedestrian circumvention in older adults: an exploratory study.

TL;DR

Physical activity level influenced general locomotor performance (slower walking, higher ankle co-contraction in inactive older adults) but not key anticipatory locomotor adjustment variables during pedestrian circumvention, except for greater between-participant variability in distance at deviation onset.

Key Findings

Physically inactive older adults walked significantly slower than physically active older adults during both circumvention and unobstructed walking.

  • 28 healthy older adults participated: 14 physically active (OAA) and 14 physically inactive (OIA).
  • Participants walked in a virtual environment while kinematic, EMG, and visual data were recorded.
  • The slower walking in OIA was seen in both the circumvention and unobstructed walking tasks.

Inactive older adults showed higher muscle co-contraction around the ankle joints than active older adults.

  • Higher ankle co-contraction was present during both circumvention and unobstructed walking.
  • The authors interpret this as a possible compensatory mechanism to enhance joint stability.
  • Muscle activity was measured with electromyography.

No significant group differences were found in key anticipatory locomotor adjustment variables: distance from the pedestrian at deviation onset or minimum clearance.

  • The hypothesis that inactive older adults would show more cautious ALA was not supported for these variables.
  • Both measures were compared between OAA and OIA during pedestrian circumvention.

Gaze behavior did not differ significantly between active and inactive older adults.

  • Visual data were recorded during the virtual circumvention tasks.
  • No significant group differences in gaze behavior were found.

Inactive older adults showed greater between-participant variability in the distance at deviation onset.

  • This was the only ALA variable in which the inactive group differed from the active group.
  • The difference was in variability across participants, not in the mean distance.

Exploratory post-hoc analyses suggested a potential influence of sex within the inactive older adult group.

  • The analyses were exploratory and post hoc.
  • The authors recommend that sex-specific factors be considered in future research.

Overall, physical activity level affected general locomotor performance but not key ALA variables during circumvention.

  • The exception was variability in distance at deviation onset.
  • The study is described as exploratory, with a small sample (n=28).

What This Means

This study compared two groups of healthy older adults, 14 who were physically active and 14 who were inactive, as they walked in a virtual environment and had to steer around an oncoming pedestrian. Researchers measured movement, muscle activity, and where people looked. They expected that inactive older adults would be more cautious when avoiding the pedestrian. The inactive group walked more slowly and showed more co-contraction (simultaneous activation of opposing muscles) around the ankles, both when avoiding the pedestrian and when walking with no obstacle. The authors suggest this may be a way of making the ankle joints more stable. However, the groups did not differ in how far from the pedestrian they began to change course, how closely they passed, or where they looked. The inactive group did vary more from person to person in when they started to deviate. This research suggests that an inactive lifestyle may influence general walking performance more than the specific strategies used to avoid other people. The study was small and exploratory, and a preliminary look suggested that sex might play a role within the inactive group. These findings would need confirmation in larger studies.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Boulo J, Simon M, McFadyen B, Blanchette A. (2026). Effects of lifestyle physical activity level on pedestrian circumvention in older adults: an exploratory study.. Experimental brain research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-026-07405-8