Short-term probiotic supplementation was safe and well accepted among children but did not produce statistically significant improvements in oral health parameters over 30 days.
Key Findings
Results
No statistically significant differences were found in any clinical or microbiological parameter between probiotic and placebo groups.
All comparisons yielded p > 0.05 across all outcome measures
Parameters assessed included Gingival Index (GI), Plaque Index (PI), ICDAS, salivary pH, buffering capacity, and salivary S. mutans concentration
The trial was double-blind, randomized, and placebo-controlled with 1:1 allocation
40 children aged 6-14 years participated from a community setting
Results
Trends toward improved oral health parameters were observed in the probiotic group despite lack of statistical significance.
Trends were observed toward higher salivary pH in the probiotic group
Trends toward improved buffering capacity were noted in the probiotic group
Trends toward reduced S. mutans counts were observed in the probiotic group
These trends did not reach statistical significance (p > 0.05)
Results
The probiotic intervention was well tolerated with high participant acceptability and no adverse events.
No adverse events were reported during the 30-day intervention period
High participant acceptability was reported for the probiotic lozenges
The intervention involved a multi-strain probiotic containing Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium administered as lozenges
The duration of supplementation was 30 days
Methods
The study was designed as a pilot randomized controlled trial to evaluate a multi-strain probiotic as an adjunct for caries prevention in children.
Streptococcus mutans was identified as the primary cariogenic bacterium of interest due to its role in biofilm acidogenicity and enamel demineralization
The probiotic contained multiple strains of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium
Participants were 40 children aged 6-14 years randomly allocated 1:1 to probiotic or placebo
The study was preregistered (10.17605/OSF.IO/GKVUW) and ethically approved
Conventional caries prevention relies mainly on mechanical plaque control and dietary modification, with probiotics investigated as potential adjuncts
Conclusions
The authors concluded that larger, longer-term trials are needed to clarify the potential role of probiotics as adjuncts in caries prevention.
The 30-day intervention period may have been insufficient to detect statistically significant changes in oral health parameters
The pilot findings highlight the feasibility of probiotic use in pediatric populations
The authors support the need for larger trials beyond the 40-participant pilot sample
Probiotics are positioned as potential adjuncts rather than replacements for conventional caries prevention strategies
Starck E, Machado V, Botelho J, Proença L, Barroso H, Ascenso C, et al.. (2025). Effects of Probiotic Short-Term Regiment on Oral Health Parameters in Children: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.. Nutrients. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17223604