Effects of the EatWelLog® Mobile Application for Managing Sarcopenic Obesity Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.
Findings support feasibility and acceptability of an EatWelLog®-supported lifestyle intervention for sarcopenic obesity, but the App's added benefit remains uncertain as this pilot was not powered for effectiveness.
Key Findings
Results
Recruitment and attendance rates supported feasibility of the intervention.
Recruitment rate was 48.8%.
Attendance rate was 83.3%.
40 adults aged ≥65 years at risk of sarcopenic obesity were randomized across two arms.
The study was a two-arm pilot RCT with assessments at baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1), and 3-month (T2) and 6-month (T3) follow-ups.
Results
Four participants in the mHealth group dropped out after the beginning of the intervention.
All four dropouts occurred in the MH (mHealth-supported) group.
No dropouts were reported for the Conventional Supervised (CS) group in this context.
The authors noted that strategies are needed to reduce attrition and improve compliance with recording diets.
Dropout rate in the MH group represented a notable feasibility concern.
Results
The EatWelLog® app demonstrated moderate-to-high acceptability among participants.
Focus group participants valued the App's dietary tracking, feedback, and reminders.
Participants identified limitations in food-recording functions.
Acceptability was assessed qualitatively through focus groups in addition to quantitative measures.
Despite moderate-to-high acceptability, compliance with diet recording was identified as an area needing improvement.
Results
No between-group differences or group × time interactions were detected for primary outcomes.
Between-group differences were not detected for primary outcomes across any assessment time point.
Group × time interactions were also not statistically significant for primary outcomes.
The pilot trial was not powered for effectiveness, limiting conclusions about the App's added benefit.
The authors note that 'the App's added benefit remains uncertain.'
Results
Muscle strength improved from baseline to post-intervention in both groups.
Both the Conventional Supervised (CS) and mHealth-supported (MH) groups showed muscle strength improvements from T0 to T1.
No statistically significant between-group differences were detected for muscle strength.
Improvements were observed in both groups receiving the same core intervention: three individualized dietitian consultations, five group nutrition classes, and eight weekly 60-minute multicomponent exercise sessions.
The shared intervention components make it difficult to attribute muscle strength gains to the app specifically.
Results
Physical performance showed improvements in the mHealth group across all follow-up assessments.
The MH group showed physical performance improvements at T1, T2 (3-month follow-up), and T3 (6-month follow-up).
The MH group used EatWelLog® during the intervention and throughout the 6-month follow-up period.
No between-group differences in physical performance were statistically detected.
The sustained improvement across all follow-up time points in the MH group is notable despite the lack of powered statistical comparison.
Methods
The intervention was an 8-week program combining dietitian consultations, nutrition classes, and multicomponent exercise sessions.
Both groups received three individualized dietitian consultations, five group nutrition classes, and eight weekly 60-minute multicomponent exercise sessions.
The MH group additionally used the EatWelLog® app during the intervention and the 6-month follow-up.
The intervention targeted community-dwelling older adults aged ≥65 years at risk of sarcopenic obesity.
Exercise combined with a hypocaloric high-protein diet is the recommended approach for sarcopenic obesity, which informed the intervention design.
Conclusions
The authors concluded that a larger, adequately powered RCT is warranted to determine the App's effectiveness.
The pilot was explicitly 'not powered for effectiveness,' limiting conclusions.
Strategies are needed to reduce attrition and improve compliance with dietary recording before scaling up.
The study evaluated feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects as its primary aims.
Findings were described as supportive of proceeding to a larger trial.
What This Means
This research suggests that using a mobile phone app called EatWelLog® to help older adults manage sarcopenic obesity — a condition where people have both too little muscle and too much body fat — is feasible and reasonably well-accepted. The study enrolled 40 adults aged 65 and older who were at risk of this condition and randomly assigned them to either a conventional program or the same program supplemented with the app. Both groups participated in an 8-week program that included meetings with a dietitian, nutrition classes, and weekly exercise sessions. The group using the app also tracked their diet through it during the program and for six months afterward. Recruitment and attendance rates were acceptable, and participants who used the app reported valuing features like diet tracking, feedback, and reminders, though they found some food-recording functions difficult to use.
Both groups showed improvements in muscle strength after the 8-week program, and the app-using group showed improvements in physical performance that persisted across all follow-up assessments up to six months. However, the study did not find statistically significant differences between the two groups on any primary outcome measures. Four participants in the app group dropped out early, raising concerns about keeping users engaged. Importantly, this was a small pilot study not designed to definitively test whether the app provides extra benefit beyond the standard program, so the results cannot confirm or rule out an added benefit from the app.
This research suggests that mobile health apps like EatWelLog® could be a practical tool to support dietary self-management in older adults with sarcopenic obesity, but more work is needed. The authors recommend that future studies address dropout and improve how users record their food intake, and that a larger study with enough participants to properly test effectiveness should be conducted. The findings provide a useful foundation for that future research.
Check Your Own Numbers
Upload your bloodwork. We'll cross-reference your results against this study and 4,700 others.
Liu J, Quan Y, Mak P, Law M, Lo K, Li T, et al.. (2026). Effects of the EatWelLog® Mobile Application for Managing Sarcopenic Obesity Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.. Nutrients. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18193243