Cardiovascular

Efficacy of conbercept pro re nata (PRN) versus treat-and-extend (T&E) regimens following five initial monthly doses in diabetic macular edema: a 24-month retrospective cohort study.

TL;DR

Both 5+PRN and 5+T&E conbercept regimens demonstrated significant improvements in visual acuity and retinal anatomical structure over 24 months, with the 5+T&E group achieving equivalent outcomes with fewer mean injections and follow-up visits.

Key Findings

Significant improvements in BCVA, CFT, and microaneurysm count were observed as early as 6 months after treatment in both regimen groups and were sustained through 24 months.

  • Both the 5+PRN group (n=60) and the 5+T&E group (n=59) showed these early improvements
  • 119 total patients with DME were retrospectively analyzed
  • All patients received 5 initial monthly loading doses before being assigned to either PRN or T&E maintenance
  • No statistically significant differences in these outcomes were detected between the two groups at any time point

Significant improvements in retinal vein diameter and deep capillary plexus vessel density (DCP-VD) became evident at 18 months post-treatment in both groups.

  • These vascular parameters showed a delayed response compared to BCVA and CFT, which improved by 6 months
  • No significant differences in these outcomes were observed between the 5+PRN and 5+T&E groups
  • Both groups were compared using baseline and post-treatment optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) measurements

Both hard exudate (HE) area and hemorrhage area showed significant improvements only at 24 months after treatment.

  • These structural parameters demonstrated the slowest response to treatment among all measured outcomes
  • Improvements were seen in both the 5+PRN and 5+T&E groups
  • No statistically significant differences between the two groups were reported for these measures

No statistically significant change in foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area was detected in either group during the 24-month follow-up period.

  • FAZ area was measured at baseline and at multiple follow-up time points
  • This finding applied to both the 5+PRN and 5+T&E groups
  • FAZ area was among the parameters assessed via OCTA imaging

There were no statistically significant differences in any therapeutic outcome between the 5+PRN and 5+T&E regimens over 24 months.

  • Outcomes compared included BCVA, CFT, MA count, retinal vein diameter, DCP-VD, FAZ area, HE area, and hemorrhage area
  • Equivalent efficacy was maintained despite different injection frequencies between groups
  • The study was a retrospective cohort design, which limits causal inference

The 5+T&E group required significantly fewer intravitreal injections over 24 months compared to the 5+PRN group.

  • Mean number of injections was 11.44 ± 1.74 in the 5+T&E group versus 14.02 ± 2.05 in the 5+PRN group
  • The difference in injection frequency was statistically significant
  • Both groups received 5 initial monthly loading doses before entering their respective maintenance regimens

The 5+T&E group had significantly fewer follow-up clinic visits over 24 months compared to the 5+PRN group.

  • Average number of follow-up visits was 13.94 ± 2.60 in the 5+T&E group versus 24.89 ± 1.67 in the 5+PRN group
  • The difference in visit frequency was statistically significant
  • The substantially lower visit burden in the T&E group reflects that PRN requires monitoring visits even when injections are not administered

What This Means

This research suggests that intravitreal injections of conbercept, an anti-VEGF drug, can meaningfully improve vision and retinal health in people with diabetic macular edema (DME), a common diabetes complication that can cause vision loss due to fluid buildup in the central part of the retina. The study followed 119 patients for two years, all of whom received five monthly injections to start. After that, half were treated with a 'pro re nata' (PRN) approach — meaning injections were given only when signs of disease activity returned at monitoring visits — while the other half followed a 'treat-and-extend' (T&E) strategy, where treatment intervals were gradually lengthened based on how well each patient was responding. Both approaches produced similar improvements in vision, retinal thickness, blood vessel health, and other measures of disease, with these gains appearing as early as six months into treatment and holding through the full two years. The key practical difference between the two strategies was in the burden they placed on patients and the healthcare system. Patients in the T&E group received an average of about 11.4 injections over two years compared to about 14 injections in the PRN group, and they needed roughly 14 clinic visits compared to nearly 25 visits for PRN patients. This research suggests that the T&E approach can achieve the same level of disease control with fewer injections and far fewer clinic visits, which could meaningfully reduce time, cost, and inconvenience for patients. One notable finding was that some measures — particularly those related to blood vessels, hard deposits (hard exudates), and bleeding in the retina — took longer to improve than basic vision and retinal thickness measures, with some not showing significant change until 18 or even 24 months of follow-up. This highlights that the full benefits of anti-VEGF treatment for DME may take considerable time to become apparent, and sustained treatment may be necessary to achieve improvements across all aspects of the disease.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Yang M, Jiang P, Liu Y, Wang J, Zhao X, Wang N, et al.. (2026). Efficacy of conbercept pro re nata (PRN) versus treat-and-extend (T&E) regimens following five initial monthly doses in diabetic macular edema: a 24-month retrospective cohort study.. Frontiers in endocrinology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2026.1875115