Cardiovascular

Efficacy of Diabetic Foot Ulcer Treatment and Possible Ways for Improvement: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

TL;DR

At 6 months, healing rates for diabetic foot ulcers were 48%, with multivariable analysis revealing ethnic group and impossibility of revascularization as independent predictors of non-healing, and previous major amputation, osteomyelitis, and white blood cell count as independent predictors of amputation.

Key Findings

At 6 months, less than half of diabetic foot ulcer patients achieved wound healing, with notable rates of amputation and death.

  • Healing rate at 6 months was 48%
  • Minor amputation rate was 4% and major amputation rate was 5%
  • 6% of patients died during the follow-up period
  • 29% of patients remained unhealed at 6 months
  • 8% were lost to follow-up

Ethnic group and impossibility of revascularization were identified as independent predictors of non-healing in multivariable analysis.

  • Multivariable analysis was used to identify independent predictors
  • Two independent predictors of non-healing were identified: ethnic group and impossibility of revascularization
  • Limb ischemia occurred in 44 patients (49% of the cohort)
  • Revascularization was conducted for only 16 patients despite 44 having limb ischemia

Previous major amputation, presence of osteomyelitis, and white blood cell count were independent predictors of amputation.

  • Three independent predictors of amputation were identified via multivariable analysis
  • Predictors included previous major amputation, presence of osteomyelitis, and white blood cell count
  • Combined minor and major amputation rates were 9% at 6 months
  • These predictors were identified from a cohort of 90 patients

Implementation of international guidelines for diabetic foot care was suboptimal prior to patients reaching the tertiary care center.

  • Previous treatment was conducted by a family doctor in 30%, at a local wound clinic in 7%, by other medical specialists in 27%, and by the patient/relatives in 29%
  • Off-loading devices were prescribed for only 37% of patients at the prior treatment stage
  • Only 35% were referred to a vascular surgeon prior to tertiary care
  • Median wound duration at presentation was 29 days (range 1–1461 days), indicating many wounds had been present for extended periods before specialist care

The study cohort was composed predominantly of older patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus presenting with wounds of variable duration.

  • 90 patients were treated for diabetic foot ulcers/wounds between May and December 2023
  • Median age was 65 years (range 37–90 years)
  • 96% of patients had type 2 diabetes mellitus
  • Median wound duration was 29 days (range 1–1461 days)
  • 35 patients received only outpatient care

Limb ischemia was highly prevalent in the cohort, but revascularization was performed in only a minority of affected patients.

  • Limb ischemia was present in 44 patients (49% of the cohort)
  • Revascularization was conducted for only 16 of the 44 patients with limb ischemia
  • Impossibility of revascularization was an independent predictor of non-healing
  • Only 35% of patients had been referred to a vascular surgeon prior to tertiary center treatment

What This Means

This research suggests that diabetic foot ulcers remain difficult to treat effectively, even in a specialized tertiary care setting. In a group of 90 patients treated at one center over roughly seven months, only about half had their wounds healed after six months, and a notable proportion required amputation, died, or remained unhealed. A key concern highlighted by the study was that many patients arrived at the specialist center after long delays, having previously been managed by general practitioners, wound clinics, or even themselves — and most had not received recommended care such as pressure-relieving devices or referral to vascular surgeons. The study identified several factors that made outcomes worse. Patients who could not undergo a procedure to restore blood flow to their feet (revascularization) were much less likely to heal, which is significant given that nearly half of all patients had reduced blood supply to their limbs. Patients from certain ethnic groups also had worse healing outcomes, though the paper does not detail why. For those who required amputation, having had a previous major amputation, having a bone infection (osteomyelitis), and elevated white blood cell counts were all associated with higher amputation risk. This research suggests that outcomes for people with diabetic foot ulcers could be substantially improved through better implementation of existing international care guidelines at every level of the healthcare system — from family doctors through to specialist centers. The authors emphasize the need for regular preventive foot care for high-risk diabetes patients, earlier referral to specialists when ulcers develop, greater availability of wound clinics, and improved access to vascular surgery for patients with poor circulation.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Gurevich M, Udovichenko O, Kabha N, Takrori L, Ben Natan M, Behrbalk E. (2026). Efficacy of Diabetic Foot Ulcer Treatment and Possible Ways for Improvement: A Retrospective Cohort Study.. The Israel Medical Association journal : IMAJ. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42867096/