Cardiovascular

Electrosurgical Septotomy Across the Full Spectrum of Aortic Dissection.

TL;DR

Electrosurgical septotomy was feasible across the full spectrum of aortic dissection and, in selected patients, as stand-alone treatment for malperfusion, using standard electrosurgical equipment; given the small, heterogeneous cohort and short follow-up, the findings demonstrate feasibility rather than durability.

Key Findings

Septotomy was technically successful in 20 of 21 consecutive patients scheduled for the procedure on an intention-to-treat basis.

  • Retrospective intention-to-treat analysis of 21 consecutive patients scheduled for septotomy between June 2022 and May 2026.
  • Septotomy was performed in 20 of 21 patients, giving a technical success rate of 95%.
  • The membrane was crossed by needle re-entry and divided with an electrified through-and-through guidewire at 40-60 W under fluoroscopy.
  • No routine intravascular ultrasound or image fusion was used.

Septotomy was performed for several indications, most commonly landing-zone preparation, followed by malperfusion.

  • Landing-zone preparation accounted for 57% of indications.
  • Malperfusion accounted for 33% of indications.
  • Other indications were preparation for open repair and true-lumen collapse.

Malperfusion resolved in all patients treated for that indication, including as stand-alone treatment.

  • Malperfusion resolved in all 7 patients treated for malperfusion.
  • The authors conclude septotomy can serve as stand-alone treatment for malperfusion in selected patients.

The perfused-lumen index rose markedly after septotomy.

  • The index (perfused lumen divided by total aortic diameter) was measured before and after the procedure.
  • The median rose from 0.16 to 0.98 in 18 patients (P < .001).

No stroke, spinal cord ischaemia, or retrograde type A dissection occurred.

  • These neurological and dissection-extension complications were absent in the cohort.
  • No intraprocedural deaths occurred.

Mortality was 10% at 30 days, 14% in hospital, and 19% overall, including one fatal delayed aortic rupture.

  • Thirty-day, in-hospital, and overall mortality were 10%, 14%, and 19%, respectively.
  • One death was due to delayed aortic rupture.
  • There was no intraprocedural death.

Three unplanned reinterventions occurred over a short follow-up.

  • Median follow-up was 5.1 months.
  • Authors note the cohort was small and heterogeneous, so findings demonstrate feasibility rather than durability.

The technique was performed using standard electrosurgical equipment without specialized imaging guidance.

  • Needle re-entry and an electrified through-and-through guidewire at 40-60 W were used under fluoroscopy.
  • Intravascular ultrasound and image fusion were not routinely used.

What This Means

This study looked at a catheter-based technique for aortic dissection, a condition in which the wall of the body's main artery tears and splits blood flow into two channels separated by a thin membrane. In the procedure, doctors use an electrified guidewire to cut through that membrane so the aorta becomes a single channel again. Earlier experience with this approach came mostly from long-standing aortic aneurysms after dissection. Here, 21 consecutive patients treated at one center over about four years had the procedure planned for a range of reasons, including preparing the aorta for a stent graft, treating poor blood supply to organs or limbs (malperfusion), and preparing for open surgery. The procedure was completed in 20 of 21 patients. In all 7 patients treated for malperfusion, the problem resolved, and the proportion of the aorta that was perfused rose from a median of 0.16 to 0.98. There were no strokes, spinal cord injuries, or new tears extending toward the heart. However, 10% of patients died within 30 days and 19% overall, including one from a delayed aortic rupture, and three patients needed unplanned further procedures. This research suggests the technique can be done with standard equipment and may help some patients with malperfusion without other treatment. However, the study was small, retrospective, and included varied patients, with a median follow-up of only about five months. The authors stress that the results show feasibility, not long-term durability or proven superiority over other treatments.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Weiss G, Trnka H, Tauber S, Manville E, Arnold Z, Winkler B, et al.. (2026). Electrosurgical Septotomy Across the Full Spectrum of Aortic Dissection.. European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezag246