Body Composition

Enhanced opportunistic CT screening for osteoporosis using Machine learning derived volumetric vertebral and complementary body composition information.

TL;DR

DL segmentation-based integration of volumetric vertebral and body composition features enables accurate prediction of lumbar and femoral BMD and improves sensitivity for osteoporosis detection compared to single-slice lumbar vertebral attenuation.

Key Findings

Volumetric vertebral features significantly improved lumbar spine BMD prediction compared to single-slice lumbar attenuation alone.

  • Lumbar spine correlation coefficient was 0.92 for the volumetric vertebral feature model versus 0.56 for single-slice L1 attenuation (P < 0.001)
  • The study included 383 adults with a mean age of 59.8 years, 50.1% women, undergoing routine health check-ups with same-day abdomen CT and DXA
  • A two-stage 3DnnU-Net was developed using 475 CT scans from clinical and public datasets to segment individual thoracolumbar vertebrae

Volumetric vertebral features significantly improved osteoporosis classification compared to lumbar vertebral attenuation alone.

  • AUROC was 0.95 for the volumetric model versus 0.87 for single-slice L1 attenuation (P = 0.004)
  • The comparison was made against conventional linear regression using single-slice lumbar (L1) attenuation
  • Models were built to estimate DXA-derived lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip BMD

Adding body composition metrics to volumetric vertebral features significantly increased sensitivity for osteoporosis classification while maintaining high specificity.

  • Sensitivity increased from 76% to 86% when body composition metrics were added (P = 0.046)
  • High specificity of 95% was maintained after adding body composition features
  • Muscle and fat were segmented using a predeveloped 3D U-Net called DeepCatch
  • Body composition features also further enhanced hip BMD predictions

Incorporating clinical variables (age, sex, BMI) provided no additional benefit beyond volumetric vertebral and body composition features.

  • Three model types were compared: vertebral features alone, combined vertebral and body composition features, and these features plus clinical data (age, sex, body mass index)
  • Adding clinical variables to the combined vertebral and body composition model did not further improve BMD prediction or osteoporosis classification
  • This was assessed across lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip BMD predictions

The study used a retrospective design with same-day CT and DXA measurements as the reference standard for BMD.

  • 383 adults undergoing routine health check-ups were included
  • All participants had same-day abdomen CT scans and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)
  • Mean participant age was 59.8 years with 50.1% women
  • The segmentation model was trained on 475 CT scans from both clinical and public datasets

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Song J, Cho S, Yoo H, Cho S, Hong N, Yoon S. (2025). Enhanced opportunistic CT screening for osteoporosis using Machine learning derived volumetric vertebral and complementary body composition information.. European journal of radiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112555