Cardiovascular

Etiology and management of venous thromboembolism recurrence in patients anticoagulated for venous thromboembolism: a single-center study.

TL;DR

Recurrence of VTE on anticoagulation (ROA) affected 3% of patients, with nearly half of events attributable to modifiable causes, and true anticoagulant failure (ACF) occurring in only 17.3% of ROA cases.

Key Findings

The incidence of VTE recurrence on anticoagulation (ROA) was 3.0% in a large registry cohort.

  • 4,980 patients with acute VTE were enrolled in the Mayo Clinic VTE Registry from 2013 to 2022.
  • 150 ROA events occurred in 130 patients (3.0% of the total cohort).
  • ROA was defined as any new thrombotic event in patients prescribed and recently taking anticoagulants.
  • Charts of all patients with VTE recurrence despite anticoagulation were reviewed.

The most frequently documented reasons for ROA were altered absorption, recent interruption of therapy, and medication dosing issues.

  • Altered absorption was documented in 40 patients (26.7% of ROA events).
  • Recent interruption of therapy was documented in 37 patients (24.7% of ROA events).
  • Medication dosing issues were documented in 35 patients (23.3% of ROA events).
  • These three categories together accounted for the majority of identifiable ROA causes.

Malignancy was present in a large majority of patients with ROA, with a substantial proportion having metastatic disease.

  • Malignancy was present in 107 of 130 patients (71.3%) with ROA.
  • Of those with malignancy, 47 (43.9%) had metastatic malignancy.
  • The high prevalence of malignancy highlights cancer as a major clinical context for ROA.

Half of ROA events were attributed to a modifiable cause, while true anticoagulant failure (ACF) was identified in only 17.3% of patients.

  • ROA was attributed to a modifiable cause in 75 (50.0%) patients.
  • ACF was defined as ROA in the absence of modifiable risk factors.
  • Only 26 (17.3%) patients had no identifiable reasons for failure and were labeled as ACF.
  • The remaining patients had mixed or unclear contributing factors.

After a recurrent VTE event, the most common management strategy was transition to an alternative anticoagulant, most frequently enoxaparin.

  • 92 patients (61.3%) were transitioned to an alternative anticoagulant after ROA.
  • Enoxaparin was the most frequently chosen alternative anticoagulant.
  • 27 patients (18.0%) remained on the same medication at an increased dose.
  • 27 patients (18.0%) did not have any change in therapy.
  • 4 patients (2.7%) had unclear management strategies.

The study proposes distinct definitions for ROA and ACF to improve clarity in describing VTE recurrence during anticoagulation.

  • ROA was defined as any new thrombotic event in patients prescribed and recently taking anticoagulants.
  • ACF was defined as ROA in the absence of modifiable risk factors.
  • The authors note that ROA and ACF are 'frequently described but poorly defined' in existing literature.
  • The study outlines a practice strategy for evaluating and managing ROA based on these definitions.

What This Means

This research suggests that blood clot recurrence in patients already taking blood thinners (anticoagulants) — a situation called 'recurrence on anticoagulation' or ROA — affects about 3% of patients treated for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Importantly, the study found that approximately half of these recurrences were linked to preventable or fixable causes, such as problems with how the medication was absorbed by the body, issues with dosing, or recent interruptions in taking the medication. Cancer was extremely common among affected patients, present in over 70% of cases, with nearly half of those having advanced (metastatic) cancer. The study also makes an important distinction between ROA — any recurrence while on anticoagulation — and true 'anticoagulant failure' (ACF), which is recurrence with no identifiable or fixable cause. Only about 17% of ROA patients truly had ACF by this stricter definition, meaning the medication genuinely appeared to stop working without any explainable reason. When doctors did need to change treatment after a recurrence, the most common approach was to switch to a different blood thinner, most often enoxaparin (a type of injectable low-molecular-weight heparin). This research matters because it highlights that many blood clot recurrences in anticoagulated patients are not inevitable medication failures — they may be preventable with careful attention to how patients are taking their medications, potential drug absorption problems, and treatment interruptions. The clear definitions proposed for ROA versus ACF could help clinicians better evaluate and communicate about these cases, and the described management strategies offer practical guidance for a challenging clinical situation.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Brunton N, Wysokinski W, Hodge D, Vlazny D, McBane R, Houghton D, et al.. (2026). Etiology and management of venous thromboembolism recurrence in patients anticoagulated for venous thromboembolism: a single-center study.. Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpth.2026.106847