Cardiovascular

Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of enhanced cardiovascular-renal-metabolic (CVRM) screening in UK, France, Germany and Australia: a microsimulation-based enhanced CVRM screening analysis.

TL;DR

Under the modeled assumptions, comprehensive CVRM screening was projected to improve population health and be cost saving (dominant from payer and societal perspectives) over 20 years in the UK, France, Germany and Australia, while also reducing hospital bed-days, productivity losses and CO2 emissions.

Key Findings

Enhanced CVRM screening was projected to reduce mortality in all four countries over 20 years among people aged ≥35 years, with benefits growing over time.

  • Mortality reductions ranged from 109,863 in Australia to 467,297 in Germany.
  • Most survival gains accrued after the first decade.
  • A discrete-time patient-level microsimulation projected 20-year health trajectories calibrated to country-specific demographic and epidemiologic profiles.

Enhanced screening was projected to generate large numbers of life-years gained in all four countries.

  • Life-years gained ranged from 640,870 to 2,803,783 across countries (Australia lowest, Germany highest by the mortality pattern).
  • Benefits were consistent across countries and increased over time.
  • Population was aged ≥35 years over a 20-year horizon.

Under the modeled assumptions, the enhanced screening strategy was cost saving in all four countries and dominant from payer and societal perspectives.

  • Total savings ranged from $368.9 million in Australia to $46.5 billion in Germany.
  • Analyses used country-specific costs and wages.
  • Strategy was compared against current standard of care (SoC).

Enhanced screening was also projected to provide additional healthcare, societal and environmental benefits.

  • Benefits included fewer hospital bed-days and lower productivity losses.
  • CO2-equivalent emissions were reduced, using country-specific emission factors.
  • Analyses were conducted from payer, societal, and environmental perspectives.

The enhanced strategy differed from standard of care by broader eligibility, more frequent screening, and assessment of key CVRM indicators, and modeled six interacting conditions.

  • Conditions modeled were hypertension, type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease, dyslipidemia, obesity, and heart failure.
  • Disease progression used validated country-specific risk equations capturing multimorbidity and dynamic risk interactions.

Results depended on structural and epidemiologic assumptions, and uncertainty analysis was limited to deterministic sensitivity analysis.

  • Key assumptions included screening uptake, disease progression, and risk equation recalibration.
  • Deterministic sensitivity analyses varied key parameters by ±20%.
  • Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was not performed.

The authors conclude that comprehensive CVRM screening, when embedded in preventive care pathways with appropriate follow-up, may improve population health while generating economic, societal and environmental benefits.

  • Benefit realization is conditional on linkage to appropriate follow-up care.

What This Means

This study used a computer simulation to estimate what would happen over 20 years if the UK, France, Germany and Australia adopted broader and more frequent screening for a group of connected conditions: high blood pressure, type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease, abnormal cholesterol, obesity and heart failure. It compared this to current screening practice in adults aged 35 and over. The model projected fewer deaths in every country (from about 110,000 fewer in Australia to about 467,000 fewer in Germany) and between roughly 641,000 and 2.8 million additional years of life. Most of the survival gains appeared after the first 10 years. The screening was also projected to save money for health payers and society (from $368.9 million in Australia to $46.5 billion in Germany), with fewer hospital days, less lost work productivity and lower carbon emissions. These are model-based projections, not results from a trial. They depend on assumptions such as how many people take up screening, how diseases progress, and how risk equations are adjusted. Uncertainty was tested only by varying parameters by ±20%, not with a full probabilistic analysis. This research suggests that screening could be worthwhile if people found to have these conditions are linked to appropriate follow-up care, but real-world results may differ.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Adshead F, Xydopoulos G, Vasilopoulos V, Babin A, Banerjee A, Detournay B, et al.. (2026). Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of enhanced cardiovascular-renal-metabolic (CVRM) screening in UK, France, Germany and Australia: a microsimulation-based enhanced CVRM screening analysis.. Journal of medical economics. https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2026.2746285