The Modified Barthel Index suffers from a ceiling effect in the older Australian reablement context, limiting its ability to inform evidence-based changes to program delivery in the Short-Term Restorative Care program.
Key Findings
Results
The MBI showed significant differences between STRC program responders and non-responders at baseline, but this finding is likely attributable to the large sample size.
Statistical significance was found at p ≤ 0.05
The study included 921 participants from a single aged care provider
Data were collected retrospectively from January 2018 to March 2023
Authors note the significance 'is likely due to the sample size used' rather than a meaningful clinical distinction
Results
The Modified Barthel Index suffers from a ceiling effect in the studied older Australian reablement population.
The ceiling effect was identified as a key limitation of the MBI in this context
The ceiling effect means participants at or near the top of the scale cannot show further improvement, limiting sensitivity to change
This finding undermines the MBI's suitability as the sole outcome measure for the STRC program
The ceiling effect limits the ability of the MBI to capture functioning and self-care ability improvements in this population
Results
Generalised Linear Modelling revealed that the MBI has limited utility for informing changes to STRC program delivery.
Generalised Linear Modelling was performed to investigate the utility of the MBI to inform changes to the delivery of the intervention
The analysis was conducted on a retrospective cohort of 921 STRC participants
The MBI's ability to 'inform evidence-based changes relating to program delivery is limited' according to the authors
The findings were based on data from a single aged care provider in Australia
Conclusions
The study found that a range of standardised assessments dependent on participant goals should replace the single MBI metric in future reablement programs.
Authors recommend implementing 'a range of standardised assessments dependent on the participant's goals' in future programs
The Restorative Care Pathway in the Support at Home program is cited as an example of a more appropriate assessment framework
The recommendation is based on identified limitations of the MBI as the sole reporting metric
The MBI is currently the sole reporting metric required by the Australian Government for the STRC program
Methods
The study was a retrospective cohort design using historical data from 921 STRC participants at a single Australian aged care provider.
Data collection spanned January 2018 to March 2023
All participants were involved in the Short-Term Restorative Care (STRC) program
The study compared program responders and non-responders across a range of demographic variables
Data were sourced from a single aged care provider located in Australia
Schmidt L, Broszczak D, MacAndrew M, Parker C. (2026). Evaluating the Modified Barthel Index for Policy and Practice in Reablement: Lessons From Australia's Short-Term Restorative Care Program.. Australasian journal on ageing. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajag.70136