Aging & Longevity

Everyday discrimination among middle-aged and older adults in India: a multilevel cross-sectional analysis from the Longitudinal Ageing Study in India.

TL;DR

Everyday discrimination among Indian adults aged 45 and above showed significant state/union territory and community-level geographic variation, with men, non-married adults, migrant residents, rural dwellers, and those with functional disability or physical/mental impairment having higher discrimination rates.

Key Findings

Adults with physical or mental impairment had significantly higher everyday discrimination rates than those without.

  • IRR = 2.15 [95% CI: 1.88, 2.45] for adults with physical or mental impairment
  • This was the strongest individual-level predictor of everyday discrimination in the study
  • Analysis used multilevel negative binomial regression
  • Sample consisted of 61,722 participants from the Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (2017-18)

Adults with functional disability had significantly higher everyday discrimination rates than those without functional disability.

  • IRR = 1.43 [95% CI: 1.32, 1.55] for adults with functional disability
  • Functional disability was a distinct variable from physical or mental impairment in the analysis
  • Finding was derived from multilevel negative binomial regression models
  • Study included adults aged 45 and above across India

Community (village/ward) level accounted for more geographic variance in everyday discrimination than the state/union territory level.

  • Community level accounted for roughly 60% of geographic variation across models
  • State/UT level accounted for roughly 40% of geographic variation across models
  • Geographic variance was partitioned using multilevel regression analysis
  • Authors concluded that 'community-based contextual factors necessitate further research'

Significant state/union territory-level variation in everyday discrimination scores was observed across India.

  • Nagaland, Tripura, Mizoram, and Lakshadweep had comparatively lower ED scores than the national average
  • Jammu and Kashmir, Delhi, Chhattisgarh, and Karnataka had higher ED scores than the national average
  • Analysis was based on 61,722 participants from the Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (2017-18)
  • Multilevel negative binomial regression was used to account for geographic clustering

Men, non-married adults, migrant residents, and adults in rural areas had higher everyday discrimination rates.

  • These sociodemographic characteristics were independently associated with higher ED rates in multilevel negative binomial regression
  • Rural residence was associated with higher ED rates compared to urban residence
  • Migrant residents had higher ED rates than non-migrant residents
  • Sample included 61,722 adults aged 45 and above from the 2017-18 Longitudinal Ageing Study in India

Higher education level and higher household monthly per capita income were associated with reduced everyday discrimination rates.

  • The relationship between education and ED showed that increases in education level corresponded with reductions in ED rates
  • Similarly, increases in household monthly per capita income were associated with reductions in ED rates
  • These were described as general trends in the multilevel negative binomial regression analysis
  • The study population comprised Indian adults aged 45 years and older

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Sadhu R, Ko S, Subramanian S, Kim R. (2026). Everyday discrimination among middle-aged and older adults in India: a multilevel cross-sectional analysis from the Longitudinal Ageing Study in India.. Scientific reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37790-7