The ICARB protocol was feasible and acceptable over 4 weeks under free-living conditions, with strong adherence potential, supporting its short-term practicality and warranting longer-term and controlled studies to assess metabolic and behavioural outcomes.
Key Findings
Results
The ICARB protocol achieved strong adherence, with 24 of 28 participants meeting the ≤50 g/day carbohydrate target on low-carbohydrate days at both weeks 1 and 4.
37 participants were enrolled, with 34 completing the study (16 male; mean age 22.3 ± 5.4 years; 10 with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m²)
Mean carbohydrate reduction was 128.7 ± 90.4 g/day in Week 1 compared with non-restricted days (p < 0.0001)
Mean carbohydrate reduction was 136.9 ± 101.8 g/day in Week 4 compared with non-restricted days (p < 0.0001)
The protocol required limiting carbohydrate intake to ≤50 g on two non-consecutive days per week while maintaining unrestricted intake on remaining days
Results
Participants who were overweight showed significant reductions in body weight and fat mass over the 4-week ICARB protocol.
Body weight reduction in overweight participants was -1.1 ± 1.4 kg (p = 0.04)
Fat mass reduction in overweight participants was -0.95 ± 1.0 kg (p = 0.02)
No group-level changes in body weight or fat mass were observed across all participants
The study did not prescribe energy restriction on any days
Results
Most participants expressed willingness to maintain the ICARB diet beyond the study period, with suggested durations ranging from an additional 2 weeks to indefinitely.
Participant perceptions were evaluated through qualitative exit interviews
Perceived benefits included improved dietary awareness, energy, and mood
Challenges included identifying foods that met the carbohydrate criteria, navigating social eating occasions, and limited food choices when dining out
Participants described adaptation strategies including meal planning and forming consistent routines
Methods
The study was designed as a feasibility study evaluating a 4-week ICARB protocol in free-living adults without prescribed energy restriction.
Healthy adults aged 19–65 years with a BMI of 19–39 kg/m² were recruited
Participants were required to be weight-stable, not following a restrictive diet, and free from diagnosed medical conditions
Exclusion criteria included high physical activity (>3 sessions/week), use of weight-altering medications, pregnancy or breastfeeding, and indicators of disordered eating or poor sleep quality
Outcome measures included dietary intake, body weight, adiposity, resting energy expenditure (REE), and fasted respiratory quotient (RQ)
Conclusions
The ICARB protocol was found to be feasible and acceptable over 4 weeks under free-living conditions, supporting its short-term practicality.
34 of 37 enrolled participants completed the study, indicating a low dropout rate
Both quantitative outcomes and qualitative exit interviews were used to assess feasibility and acceptability
The authors conclude that findings 'warrant longer-term and controlled studies to assess metabolic and behavioural outcomes'
The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07056465)
Biyikoglu H, Tse Y, Ding R, Mold F, Collins A. (2026). Exploring Adherence and Acceptability of an Intermittent Carbohydrate Restriction Regime (ICARB) in Free-Living Adults: A Feasibility Study.. Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association. https://doi.org/10.1111/jhn.70188