Men with GHD experienced more beneficial effects of GHRT on body composition and lipoprotein metabolism than women in early years of treatment, but no sex differences were found in the risk of developing non-fatal cardiovascular or cerebrovascular diseases during GHRT.
Key Findings
Results
Men with growth hormone deficiency had a more unfavorable cardiovascular risk profile than women at baseline.
Study included 1335 men and 1251 women with severe GHD registered in the Dutch National Registry of GH Treatment in Adults database
Baseline differences in CV risk profile were assessed prior to initiation of GH replacement therapy
Men showed worse baseline metrics across multiple cardiovascular risk parameters compared to women
This was a retrospective nationwide cohort study design
Results
During the first years of GHRT, reductions in waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, total cholesterol, and triglyceride levels were greater in men than in women.
All between-sex differences in these early treatment effects reached statistical significance (all P < .05)
The four parameters showing greater male benefit were waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, total cholesterol, and triglyceride levels
These differences were observed specifically during the first years of GHRT
Between-sex differences in effects during later follow-up were described as 'less clear'
Results
No sex differences were found in the risk of developing non-fatal cardiovascular or cerebrovascular diseases during GHRT.
Despite men having a more unfavorable CV risk profile at baseline, this did not translate into a sex difference in CV or cerebrovascular morbidity outcomes
Both cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease endpoints were assessed during follow-up
Only non-fatal events were analyzed for these morbidity outcomes
This finding applied across the full follow-up period in the Dutch National Registry of GH Treatment in Adults
Discussion
The study confirmed the hypothesis that women experience less beneficial effects than men from GHRT on body composition and lipoprotein metabolism, at least in early treatment years.
The stated hypothesis was that women would experience less beneficial effects than men
Results supported this hypothesis specifically for body composition (waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio) and lipoprotein metabolism (total cholesterol, triglycerides)
The sex difference in treatment efficacy was most pronounced in the early years of treatment
The advantage for men diminished over longer follow-up periods
Slagboom T, van der Lely A, Drent M, van Bunderen C. (2024). Exploring the sex difference in cardiovascular risk during growth hormone therapy in adults.. European journal of endocrinology. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejendo/lvae060