Exercise & Training

Feasibility and acceptability of ExerciseGuideUK for those living with and beyond lung cancer: a mixed methods study.

TL;DR

ExerciseGuideUK, a personalised web-based exercise platform for those living with and beyond lung cancer, showed moderate feasibility and high acceptability among users over an eight-week study period.

Key Findings

Recruitment and retention rates for ExerciseGuideUK were 30.5% and 77%, respectively, indicating moderate feasibility.

  • Eighteen participants with a mean age of 65 ± 14.42 years enrolled in the study.
  • Participants were recruited from Hull University Teaching Hospital.
  • The study duration was eight weeks.
  • The overall feasibility was characterized as 'moderate' based on combined quantitative and qualitative findings.

Digital access issues, including limited digital literacy, were a significant barrier to participation, excluding 25.4% of those screened.

  • 25.4% of screened individuals were excluded due to digital access issues.
  • Notably, some excluded participants owned smartphones, suggesting the barrier was limited digital literacy rather than device ownership alone.
  • Barriers to engagement also included treatment side effects, work responsibilities, and low confidence with technology.

Acceptability, usability, and engagement with ExerciseGuideUK were high among those who participated.

  • Acceptability was assessed using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability via qualitative interviews.
  • Usability was measured using the System Usability Scale and structured questionnaires.
  • Valued features included goal-setting tools, breathlessness management strategies, and personalised exercise prescriptions.

This study represents the first known application of the Pillar Integration Process (PIP) in the context of lung cancer, exercise, and digital health.

  • The PIP is described as a novel mixed-methods integration approach used to integrate quantitative and qualitative findings.
  • The PIP facilitated integration of findings on feasibility, engagement, barriers, and adaptation potential.
  • The authors state the PIP 'facilitated a comprehensive understanding of feasibility and acceptability, guiding informed adaptations by users.'
  • The authors note the PIP 'warrants further testing and refinement in relation to optimising digital intervention design that promotes equitable, patient-centred care.'

ExerciseGuideUK was developed as a personalised, web-based exercise platform specifically for individuals living with and beyond lung cancer to address unmet needs in this population.

  • The platform included personalised exercise prescriptions, goal-setting tools, and breathlessness management strategies.
  • The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT05121259).
  • The platform was evaluated using both quantitative measures (System Usability Scale, structured questionnaires) and qualitative interviews.

What This Means

This research suggests that ExerciseGuideUK, a website-based exercise program designed specifically for people living with or beyond lung cancer, is largely acceptable and easy to use for those who can access it. In an eight-week pilot study with 18 participants recruited from a UK hospital, users found features like personalized exercise plans, goal-setting tools, and strategies for managing breathlessness particularly helpful. Those who participated generally found the platform engaging and usable. However, the study also found that getting people enrolled and keeping them engaged presented challenges, reflecting only moderate overall feasibility. A particularly notable finding was that over a quarter of people initially screened were excluded because of digital access problems — and this included some people who owned smartphones, pointing to digital literacy (knowing how to use technology) rather than technology ownership as the key barrier. Other barriers included side effects from cancer treatment, work commitments, and low confidence with technology. This research matters because lung cancer patients often have significant unmet needs around physical activity support, and digital tools could help reach more people. However, the findings highlight that digital programs alone may not be equitable — people with lower digital literacy risk being left out. The study also introduced a new way of combining different types of research data (the Pillar Integration Process) to better understand how such programs work in practice, which could help researchers design more effective and inclusive digital health tools in the future.

Check Your Own Numbers

Upload your bloodwork. We'll cross-reference your results against this study and 4,700 others.

Upload Your Labs

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Curry J, Pearson M, Short C, Vandelanotte C, Evans H, Lind M, et al.. (2026). Feasibility and acceptability of ExerciseGuideUK for those living with and beyond lung cancer: a mixed methods study.. Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-026-10858-w