48-h ABPM is feasible in only about half of hemodialysis patients, with discomfort and sleep disturbance being the most frequently cited reasons for refusal and important barriers to both acceptance and completion.
Key Findings
Results
Of 440 invited hemodialysis patients, 119 (27%) refused ABPM or could not undergo recording.
440 consecutive adult in-center hemodialysis patients were recruited from eight nephrology units in Italy, Greece, and Slovenia.
27% of all invited patients refused or could not undergo ABPM recording before initiation.
Reasons for refusal or noncompletion were systematically recorded.
Results
Among the 321 patients who initiated 48-h ABPM, 29 (9%) did not complete the protocol and 35 (11%) had inadequate recordings.
321 patients initiated the 48-h ABPM protocol.
9% of those who started did not complete the protocol.
11% of those who started had inadequate recordings (defined as fewer than 70% of measurements obtained).
ABPM was considered valid if at least 70% of measurements were obtained.
Results
Valid 48-h ABPM was successfully completed by 257 patients, representing 80% of those who started ABPM but only 58% of all invited patients.
This represented 80% of the 321 patients who initiated the protocol.
This represented 58% of all 440 initially invited patients.
The study was multicenter, involving eight nephrology units across Italy, Greece, and Slovenia.
Results
The most commonly reported symptoms during 48-h ABPM were sleep interruption, itching, and pain during BP measurements.
Sleep interruption was reported by 32% of patients.
Itching was reported by 24% of patients.
Pain during BP measurements was reported by 20% of patients.
Tolerability and sleep disturbance were assessed using standardized questionnaires.
Results
Continuous pain and inability to sleep were significantly associated with the 'dipping' BP phenotype.
The association between symptoms and BP phenotype was assessed among patients who completed valid ABPM recordings.
Both continuous pain and inability to sleep were significantly associated with the dipping BP phenotype.
This finding suggests a potential interaction between ABPM-related discomfort and nocturnal BP behavior.
Background
ABPM is recommended as the gold standard for assessing blood pressure in hemodialysis patients because it enables detection of masked and nocturnal hypertension linked to adverse outcomes.
Masked and nocturnal hypertension are phenomena linked to adverse outcomes in CKD patients on hemodialysis.
Despite strong guideline recommendations for ABPM in this population, real-world feasibility remained unclear prior to this study.
The study was designed to assess feasibility and tolerability of extended 48-h ABPM in this frail population.
Torino C, Mallamaci F, Sarafidis P, Thedorakopoulou M M, Ekart R, Hojs R, et al.. (2026). Feasibility of the extended, 48-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in hemodialysis patients: a multicenter study.. Journal of hypertension. https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000004268