Sexual Health

Finding knowledge: how youth identify their candidacy and sources of information regarding sexual and reproductive health in rural KwaZulu-Natal. South Africa.

TL;DR

Youth in rural KwaZulu-Natal identified their candidacy for sexual and reproductive health information largely ad-hoc, and while able to discriminate between multiple information sources, their information landscape was strongly shaped by formal provider and parent views and limited by stigma and socioeconomic circumstances.

Key Findings

Youth identified their candidacy for SRH information through three main triggers: inability to understand what others were saying about sexual health, fear of illness in themselves or significant others, and when experiencing a health issue.

  • Identification of candidacy was largely ad-hoc rather than proactive or systematic
  • The Candidacy Framework, originally focused on service use, was adapted to apply to communication about SRH information
  • Secondary analysis of qualitative data from five studies conducted in uMkhanyakude district, KwaZulu-Natal was used
  • Data sources included interviews and group discussions with adolescents and young adults

Youth had a nuanced understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of different SRH information sources, expecting different types of information from healthcare providers, family members, and peers.

  • Participants distinguished between what types of information each source was best suited to provide
  • Healthcare providers, family members, and peers were identified as distinct categories of information sources
  • Once aware of their need for information, youth were able to identify and discriminate between multiple information sources
  • Peer sources were noted to be limited by peers' own knowledge constraints

Stigma related to youth sexual and reproductive health limited channels for communication and the ability for shared interpersonal knowledge to impact health behavior.

  • Stigma was identified as a structural barrier shaping the information landscape
  • Precarious socioeconomic circumstances further limited communication channels alongside stigma
  • The combination of stigma and socioeconomic factors constrained how interpersonal knowledge could translate into health behavior change
  • These barriers operated across multiple potential information sources

The SRH information landscape for youth was strongly shaped by formal provider and parent views of what youth should know and do, rather than being youth-driven.

  • Healthcare providers and parents exerted strong influence over the framing and content of SRH information available to youth
  • This gatekeeping effect limited the scope of information youth could access
  • Peer sources, while accessible, were limited by peers' own restricted knowledge
  • The study setting was uMkhanyakude district, a rural area of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

The adapted Candidacy Framework provided a useful lens for understanding how youth navigate SRH information-seeking, identifying multiple intervention points along the candidacy journey.

  • The Candidacy Framework was originally developed with a focus on health service use and was re-adapted here for communication
  • Transcripts were re-coded using a thematic coding framework
  • The framework identified that concerns could be addressed at various points on the candidacy journey
  • The adaptation demonstrated applicability of the framework beyond service utilization to information-seeking behavior

Despite efforts by government, non-governmental organizations, local communities and families, SRH behavior and outcomes among youth remain of concern in South Africa.

  • The study was conducted in uMkhanyakude district, KwaZulu-Natal, a rural setting
  • The population of interest was adolescents and young adults, referred to as 'youth'
  • Secondary analysis drew on data from five separate qualitative studies in the same district
  • The persistent concern about SRH outcomes motivated the need to better understand how youth navigate information sources

What This Means

This research examined how young people in a rural area of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, recognize when they need sexual and reproductive health (SRH) information and where they go to get it. Using data from interviews and group discussions collected across five separate studies in the same region, the researchers found that young people typically only realize they need SRH information when something prompts them — such as not understanding conversations about sexual health, worrying about illness, or actually experiencing a health problem. This recognition process was largely unplanned rather than something youth actively sought out ahead of time. Once young people recognized their need for information, they showed a sophisticated ability to judge which sources — healthcare workers, family members, or peers — were best suited to answer different kinds of questions. However, the overall information environment was heavily controlled by adults, particularly healthcare providers and parents, who shaped what information youth were allowed to access. Peers, while often the most accessible source, were limited because they frequently did not know much more than the young people asking them. Stigma around sexual health and poverty created additional barriers, making it harder for young people to seek help or for conversations to lead to actual changes in health behavior. This research suggests that programs aiming to improve young people's sexual and reproductive health in similar rural settings should address multiple points in the process of how young people come to seek and use health information — not just providing information, but also reducing stigma, addressing socioeconomic barriers, and rethinking the gatekeeping role that adults and healthcare systems play in controlling what young people are allowed to know.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Gumede N, Hlongwane S, Nxumalo V, Gumede D, Shahmanesh M, Seeley J, et al.. (2025). Finding knowledge: how youth identify their candidacy and sources of information regarding sexual and reproductive health in rural KwaZulu-Natal. South Africa.. BMC public health. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-22595-6