Fractionated (twice-daily) testosterone gel administration was associated with a higher proportion of patients achieving biochemical targets and a reduced peak-to-pre-dose difference within the observed sampling window, without short-term biochemical safety signals.
Key Findings
Results
Fractionated twice-daily testosterone gel dosing produced lower peak serum total testosterone levels compared to once-daily dosing at the same total daily dose.
Peak total testosterone (TT) levels: 9.0 (5.3–13.0) ng/mL with once-daily vs. 5.7 (3.6–7.1) ng/mL with twice-daily dosing
Paired difference of -3.6 ng/mL (95% CI: -4.9 to -1.8)
Peak was measured at 3 hours post-application
Study included 12 hypogonadal men who transitioned from once-daily to twice-daily 2% testosterone gel
Results
Fractionated twice-daily testosterone gel dosing produced higher nadir (pre-dose) serum total testosterone levels compared to once-daily dosing.
Nadir TT levels: 1.4 (1.1–1.8) ng/mL with once-daily vs. 3.2 (2.6–5.4) ng/mL with twice-daily dosing
Paired difference of 2.6 ng/mL (95% CI: 1.2 to 5.1)
Nadir was measured pre-dose
The same total daily dose was maintained across both regimens
Results
Fractionated dosing resulted in a reduced peak-to-pre-dose difference within the observed sampling window compared to once-daily dosing.
The reduction in peak TT combined with the increase in nadir TT narrowed the within-day fluctuation
This reflects a more stable hormonal profile over the dosing interval
Measurements were taken at 3 hours post-application (peak) and pre-dose (nadir)
Results
The proportion of patients achieving target total testosterone levels at peak increased substantially with fractionated dosing.
33% of patients achieved target TT levels at peak under once-daily dosing
83% of patients achieved target TT levels at peak under twice-daily fractionated dosing
The same 12-patient cohort was compared under both regimens
This was a retrospective real-world analysis
Results
Calculated free testosterone showed a similar pattern to total testosterone with fractionated dosing.
Free testosterone mirrored the changes seen in total testosterone: lower peaks and higher nadirs with twice-daily dosing
No specific numerical values for free testosterone are provided in the abstract
Free testosterone was calculated rather than directly measured
Results
No clinically relevant differences were observed in biochemical safety parameters between the two dosing regimens.
Parameters assessed included luteinizing hormone (LH), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), haematocrit, and haemoglobin
No short-term biochemical safety signals were identified
The study was retrospective with a small sample of 12 patients
Authors note findings should be considered hypothesis-generating
Methods
The study population was small and retrospective, limiting the generalizability of findings.
Only 12 patients met inclusion criteria
The design was a retrospective real-world exploratory clinical experience
Eligible patients required serum TT measurements at both peak and nadir under both regimens
Authors explicitly state findings are 'hypothesis-generating'
What This Means
This research suggests that splitting a daily testosterone gel dose into two smaller applications (one in the morning and one later in the day) rather than applying it all at once may lead to more stable hormone levels throughout the day. In a small group of 12 men with low testosterone (hypogonadism) who switched from once-daily to twice-daily application of the same total dose of 2% testosterone gel, the twice-daily approach produced lower hormone spikes shortly after application and higher hormone levels just before the next dose was due. This means the gap between the highest and lowest testosterone readings during the day was smaller, suggesting a more even hormonal profile.
A particularly notable finding was that far more patients reached their target testosterone levels when using the split dosing: 83% achieved the target compared to only 33% with once-daily dosing. Importantly, safety markers including prostate-specific antigen, red blood cell levels, and other hormone measures did not show any concerning changes with the fractionated approach, at least in the short term.
This research suggests that splitting the testosterone gel dose could be a practical option for men whose hormone levels fluctuate too widely with standard once-daily treatment, potentially improving both effectiveness and tolerability. However, the authors themselves emphasize that the findings are preliminary and hypothesis-generating due to the very small sample size (12 patients) and retrospective study design. Larger, prospective studies would be needed to confirm these findings before any changes to clinical practice could be recommended.
Check Your Own Numbers
Upload your bloodwork. We'll cross-reference your results against this study and 4,700 others.
Maltese V, Delbarba A, Gatta E, Vetrugno S, Sansone A, Cappelli C. (2026). Fractionated testosterone gel replacement therapy in clinical practice: A real-world exploratory clinical experience.. Endocrine. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-026-04659-8