In physically active young adults, TMI relates more strongly than BMI to bioimpedance-derived adiposity and may aid field-based screening, though athlete-level decisions should await confirmation in sport-specific, longitudinal studies using criterion methods.
Key Findings
Results
TMI showed a stronger positive correlation with body fat percentage than BMI in physically active young adults.
TMI correlation with body fat percentage: r = 0.50, p < 0.001
BMI correlation with body fat percentage: r = 0.38, p = 0.003
Body fat percentage was derived from whole-body bioimpedance analysis
Sample consisted of 59 participants (male = 37, female = 22; age 22.63 ± 2.29 years)
Results
BMI was positively correlated with hemoglobin and hematocrit in physically active young adults.
BMI correlation with hemoglobin (HGB): r = 0.32, p = 0.013
BMI correlation with hematocrit (HCT): r = 0.26, p = 0.046
These associations were not observed for TMI
Blood markers were obtained via venous blood sampling
Results
Both BMI and TMI were negatively correlated with neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR).
BMI correlation with NLR: ρ = -0.27, p = 0.041
TMI correlation with NLR: ρ = -0.27, p = 0.039
BMI was also negatively correlated with platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR): r = -0.30, p = 0.022
TMI did not show a significant correlation with PLR
Results
In the multivariable regression model, hematocrit was a significant negative predictor of body fat percentage, while TMI showed a positive but marginally non-significant association.
HCT was a significant negative predictor of adiposity: β = -0.34, p = 0.021
TMI showed a positive but marginally non-significant association with adiposity: β = 0.25, p = 0.073
Predictors in the model included BMI, TMI, HGB, HCT, NLR, and PLR
Assumptions of the regression model and multicollinearity were reported as acceptable
Methods
The study employed a cross-sectional design with physically active young adults meeting WHO/ACSM physical activity guidelines.
Physical activity status defined as ≥150 min·week⁻¹ of moderate-to-vigorous activity per WHO/ACSM guidelines
Sample size was n = 59 (37 males, 22 females), mean age 22.63 ± 2.29 years
Participants underwent anthropometry, whole-body bioimpedance analysis, and venous blood sampling
Statistical significance threshold was set at α = 0.05; normality assumptions were checked before selecting correlations and regression approaches
Background
Traditional BMI may misclassify physically active individuals with high lean mass, motivating examination of the triponderal mass index (TMI) as an alternative adiposity measure.
TMI has emerged as a potentially more accurate alternative to BMI for adiposity assessment
Evidence for TMI's utility in physically active populations was described as limited prior to this study
The concern with BMI is that it does not distinguish between fat mass and lean mass
This historical and contemporary review framing was central to the study's rationale
Yaşar O, Gürses V, Ciğerci A, Bal E, Pehlivan Y, Baş M, et al.. (2025). From BMI to TMI: revisiting adiposity and fitness assessment in young active adults through a historical and contemporary lens.. Frontiers in public health. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1700684