Gain of visceral adipose tissue rather than low skeletal muscle mass is associated with overall survival in patients with colorectal liver metastases; results from the NewEPOC study.
Aberle M, Ligthart M, et al. • European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology • 2025
Gain of visceral adipose tissue (>2% VAT-index over 12 weeks) was independently associated with worse overall survival in colorectal liver metastases patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy, while sarcopenia and skeletal muscle loss were not associated with survival.
Key Findings
Results
Skeletal muscle index (SM-index) decreased significantly during neoadjuvant chemotherapy in both men and women.
In men, SM-index decreased from 50.6 ± 8.7 to 47.6 ± 8.6 cm2/m2 (p < 0.001).
In women, SM-index decreased from 40.5 ± 6.1 to 37.7 ± 5.9 cm2/m2 (p = 0.002).
These changes occurred over the course of neoadjuvant treatment prior to resection of colorectal liver metastases.
Results
Skeletal muscle radiation attenuation (SM-RA) decreased significantly during neoadjuvant chemotherapy in men.
SM-RA decreased from 37.7 ± 7.8 to 36.0 ± 7.6 HU in men (p < 0.001).
SM-RA is a measure of muscle quality, with lower values indicating greater intramuscular fat infiltration.
The change in SM-RA was not associated with overall survival.
Results
VAT-index and SAT-index did not change significantly during neoadjuvant treatment at the group level.
Despite no statistically significant mean change in VAT or SAT indices during treatment, individual variation in VAT change had prognostic relevance.
This finding underscores that mean group-level stability can mask clinically important individual-level changes.
Results
Gaining more than 2% VAT-index over 12 weeks was independently associated with worse overall survival.
HR 2.05, 95% CI 1.12–3.76, p = 0.025.
This association was independent of other covariates in the multivariable model.
The threshold used was >2% gain in VAT-index over the approximately 12-week neoadjuvant treatment period.
Results
Sarcopenia, SM-loss, and SM-RA at baseline as well as change in SM-RA were not associated with overall survival.
Neither baseline sarcopenia status nor loss of skeletal muscle mass during chemotherapy reached statistical significance as prognostic factors for overall survival.
Both baseline SM-RA and change in SM-RA during treatment were similarly not associated with overall survival.
These null findings contrast with a growing literature suggesting sarcopenia is prognostic in cancer patients.
Results
Intervention arm assignment and undergoing resection of metastases were independently associated with overall survival.
Intervention arm (addition of cetuximab): HR 1.96, 95% CI 1.21–3.19, p = 0.009, indicating worse overall survival in the cetuximab arm.
Undergoing resection of metastases: HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.09–0.40, p < 0.001, indicating markedly better overall survival.
These factors were identified in the multivariable analysis alongside VAT gain as independent prognostic factors.
Methods
This study was a subgroup analysis of the newEPOC randomized controlled trial examining body composition changes during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases.
The newEPOC RCT is registered as NCT00482222.
Pre- and post-treatment CT scans were analyzed for total cross-sectional areas of skeletal muscle (SM), visceral adipose tissue (VAT), subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), intramuscular adipose tissue (IMAT), and skeletal muscle radiation attenuation (SM-RA).
Body composition measurements were conducted at a single lumbar vertebral level as is standard in CT-based body composition analysis.
Aberle M, Ligthart M, West M, Rensen S, Eminton Z, van Dijk D, et al.. (2025). Gain of visceral adipose tissue rather than low skeletal muscle mass is associated with overall survival in patients with colorectal liver metastases; results from the NewEPOC study.. European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2025.111179