Grief-related social media use and perceived social media support among bereaved students: associations with grief, mental health, and continuing bonds.
Gerrits C, Claes L, Andriessen K • Frontiers in public health • 2026
Grief-related social media use was positively associated with stronger grief reactions and stronger continuing bonds with the deceased among bereaved students, while perceived social media support was associated with less severe grief reactions but higher levels of mental distress.
Key Findings
Results
Grief-related social media use was positively associated with stronger grief reactions among bereaved students.
Sample: 270 students aged 18-28 from universities and higher education institutions in Flanders, Belgium.
Data were collected through an online survey and analyzed using correlation and hierarchical regression analyses.
The authors conclude that students who engage more in grief-related social media activities may be at increased risk of grief problems.
Results
Grief-related social media use was positively associated with stronger continuing bonds with the deceased.
Continuing bonds were measured by questionnaire among 270 bereaved students.
Analyses used correlation and hierarchical regression.
Social media is described as a new space for maintaining bonds with the deceased.
Results
Perceived social media support was associated with less severe grief reactions.
Finding derived from correlation and hierarchical regression analyses in 270 bereaved students.
This contrasts with the association between perceived social media support and mental distress.
Results
Perceived social media support was associated with higher levels of mental distress.
Higher perceived support was linked to more mental distress despite being linked to less severe grief.
Sample was 270 bereaved students aged 18-28 in Flanders/Belgium.
The design is cross-sectional survey-based, so direction of association cannot be established from the abstract.
Conclusions
Bereaved students who engage more in grief-related social media activities may be at increased risk of grief and mental health problems.
This is the authors' interpretation of the overall pattern of associations.
The study adds to the limited research on grief-related social media use among students.
Conclusions
The authors suggest professional and peer support providers explore the needs and coping strategies of bereaved students who use social media for support.
Providers are suggested to promote healthy coping and positive mental health outcomes.
Rationale: loss of a close person is common during students' academic careers and can affect daily and academic functioning and increase mental health risk.
What This Means
This study surveyed 270 university and higher-education students in Flanders, Belgium, aged 18-28, who had lost someone close. It asked how they use social media in relation to their grief, how supported they feel by social media, and how they were doing in terms of grief, mental health, and their ongoing sense of connection with the person who died.
Students who used social media more for grief-related purposes tended to report stronger grief reactions and stronger continuing bonds with the deceased. Students who felt supported through social media reported less severe grief reactions, but also more mental distress. Because this was a survey at one point in time, it cannot show whether social media use leads to these outcomes or whether people who are struggling more turn to social media.
This research suggests that students who engage heavily with grief-related social media activity may be more likely to be experiencing difficulties with grief and mental health. The authors suggest that counselors and peer supporters could explore how bereaved students use social media and what they need from it, to help promote healthy coping.
Gerrits C, Claes L, Andriessen K. (2026). Grief-related social media use and perceived social media support among bereaved students: associations with grief, mental health, and continuing bonds.. Frontiers in public health. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1935184