Adults with congenital heart disease had high healthcare utilization over 3 years, including frequent ED use, yet fewer than half saw a cardiology specialist, with substantial geographic variation in cardiology visit rates ranging from 21% to 59%.
Key Findings
Results
Nearly half of adults with CHD had at least one hospitalization over the 3-year study period.
45.9% of the cohort had at least one inpatient hospitalization during 2011-2013
The cohort included 18,877 adults aged 19-64 years
20.7% of the cohort had severe CHD
Data were drawn from five regions: Colorado, North Carolina, Utah, metropolitan Atlanta, and New York
Results
More than one-third of adults with CHD had at least one emergency department visit over the 3-year study period.
35.1% of the cohort had an ED visit during 2011-2013
Severe CHD was associated with lower odds of ED use than non-severe CHD
Age modified the association between CHD severity and ED use
This suggests adults with non-severe CHD may be relying on the ED for care rather than specialized outpatient services
Results
The vast majority of adults with CHD had at least one outpatient encounter, but fewer than half saw a cardiology specialist.
92.1% had at least one outpatient encounter over the 3-year period
Only 43.8% had a cardiology outpatient visit
Cardiology visit rates were particularly low among older age groups
Multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression models were used, adjusting for sex, race/ethnicity, insurance, comorbidity, and site
Results
There was marked geographic variation in cardiology visit rates across study sites.
Cardiology visit rates ranged from 21% to 59% across the five study sites
Site-level variation was described as 'marked' by the authors
Sites included Colorado, North Carolina, Utah, metropolitan Atlanta, and New York
Site was included as a random effect in the multivariable mixed-effects models
Results
Cardiac diagnostic and imaging procedures were common, occurring in more than two-thirds of the cohort.
Cardiac diagnostic/imaging procedures occurred in 67.8% of adults over the 3-year period
Cardiac therapeutic/interventional procedures occurred in 20.3%
Vascular procedures occurred in 10.5%
Severe CHD was associated with higher odds of cardiac procedures compared to non-severe CHD
Results
Severe CHD was associated with higher odds of cardiac procedures but lower odds of ED use compared to non-severe CHD.
Associations between CHD severity and healthcare utilization were assessed using multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression
Models adjusted for sex, race/ethnicity, insurance, comorbidity, and site
Age group was included as an effect modifier in the models
The inverse relationship between severe CHD and ED use suggests different patterns of care-seeking or access between severity groups
Methods
The study used a multi-site, population-based retrospective cohort design linking health and administrative records.
Adults aged 19-64 years with at least one CHD-related ICD-9-CM code recorded during 2011-2013 were included
The cohort comprised 18,877 adults across five U.S. regions
Health and administrative records were linked across sites
ICD-9-CM codes were used to identify CHD cases and classify severity as severe vs. non-severe
Results
Age modified the associations between CHD severity and healthcare utilization outcomes.
Age group was included as an effect modifier in all multivariable models
Cardiology visit rates were particularly lower among older adults with CHD
The cohort spanned ages 19-64 years, allowing examination across a wide adult age range
The finding of lower cardiology use at older ages highlights 'persistent gaps in lifelong care'
What This Means
This research examined how often adults with congenital heart disease (CHD) — heart defects present from birth — used different types of healthcare over a three-year period. The study followed nearly 19,000 adults aged 19 to 64 across five U.S. regions, looking at hospital stays, emergency room visits, regular outpatient visits, cardiology specialist visits, and various heart-related procedures. The data came from linked health and administrative records collected between 2011 and 2013.
The study found that healthcare use among adults with CHD was very high overall: nearly half were hospitalized at least once, over a third visited an emergency department, and more than two-thirds underwent cardiac imaging or diagnostic procedures over just three years. Despite this heavy use of healthcare, fewer than half of these adults saw a heart specialist (cardiologist), and this gap was even larger among older adults. There was also striking variation by geography — the rate of cardiology visits ranged from just 21% in one region to 59% in another, suggesting that where a person lives has a major impact on whether they receive specialized heart care.
This research suggests that many adults living with CHD — even those with serious forms of the condition — are not consistently receiving the specialized cardiac care that guidelines recommend for lifelong management of their condition. The frequent use of emergency departments may reflect gaps in routine specialized care. The large differences in cardiology visit rates across regions point to unequal access to CHD expertise across the United States, highlighting a need to improve how specialized care is delivered and accessed for this growing population of adults.
Crume T, Khanna A, Tillman A, Lui G, Soim A, Hsu D, et al.. (2026). Health Care Utilization in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease: Population-Based Findings.. Birth defects research. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdr2.70063