Cardiovascular

Home-based nurse-led self-management support for heart failure: a randomized controlled trial.

TL;DR

A 12-week nurse-led, stage-tailored home-based programme of home visits and telephone follow-up was associated with improved self-care behaviour in people with heart failure and showed potential to support home-based self-management when centre-based cardiac rehabilitation was unavailable.

Key Findings

At 12 weeks, the intervention group had better self-care scores than the usual-care control group.

  • Reported scores were 17.78 ± 2.93 for the intervention group versus 40.00 ± 6.49 for the control group.
  • Self-care behaviour was the primary outcome.
  • The trial was a parallel-group randomized controlled trial with 32 intervention and 31 control participants.
  • The abstract does not say which direction indicates better self-care on the scale used, and gives no p-value.

Secondary outcomes favoured the intervention group: better quality of life, higher self-efficacy, and greater 6-minute walk distance.

  • Quality of life, self-efficacy, and physical capacity (6-minute walk distance) were the prespecified secondary outcomes.
  • The abstract gives no numerical values for these outcomes.

Exploratory clinical outcomes showed changes in some parameters, including ejection fraction and body-fluid values.

  • Exploratory outcomes were body composition, ejection fraction, and HbA1c level.
  • The abstract does not report which parameters changed or by how much.

Most intervention participants reached the Transtheoretical Model action stage, and NYHA class improved significantly.

  • The programme was stage-tailored, based on the Transtheoretical Model.
  • The abstract gives no exact proportions or statistics for stage progression or NYHA change.

The trial tested a nurse-led home-based model in clinically stable adults with heart failure who could not access structured centre-based rehabilitation.

  • Eligible participants were aged 40-75 years, with NYHA class I-III heart failure and ejection fraction >30%.
  • The intervention lasted 12 weeks and used nurse-led home visits plus telephone follow-up.
  • The control group received usual care (n = 31); the intervention group had n = 32.

The authors conclude that the home-based model may support continuity of care after specialist cardiology assessment when centre-based rehabilitation is unavailable.

  • They describe the model as relevant to primary health care.
  • It may help bridge specialist cardiology care and community-based long-term support.

What This Means

This study tested whether nurse-led support at home could help people with heart failure manage their condition better. Sixty-three adults aged 40-75 with stable, mild-to-moderate heart failure were randomly assigned to either usual care or a 12-week programme. The programme combined nurse home visits with telephone follow-up and was tailored to each person's readiness to change their habits. The participants could not easily attend a centre-based cardiac rehabilitation programme. After 12 weeks, the group who received the programme had better self-care scores than the usual-care group. They also had better quality of life, greater confidence in managing their condition, and walked farther in a 6-minute walking test. Most people in the programme reached the 'action' stage of behaviour change, and their heart failure symptom class improved. Some measures of heart function and body fluid also changed, though the summary does not give details. This research suggests that nurse-led home-based support could help fill the gap when rehabilitation centres are not available. Limits are worth noting: the study was small (63 people), lasted only 12 weeks, and included only people with relatively stable heart failure. The summary available here gives few details on the size of the effects, so the findings would need confirming in larger studies.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Çelik H, Özen B. (2026). Home-based nurse-led self-management support for heart failure: a randomized controlled trial.. Primary health care research & development. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423626102059