Mental Health

Identifying social determinants of health subgroups and their associations with health outcomes in a prospective US adult COVID-19 cohort: an analysis of the INSPIRE registry.

TL;DR

SDOH-based subgroups showed persistent disparities in health outcomes post-SARS-CoV-2 infection, highlighting the urgent need for intersectional approaches to address systemic inequities in post-COVID-19 recovery.

Key Findings

Latent class analysis identified four distinct SDOH subgroups among COVID-19 patients with significant demographic differences across classes.

  • A 4-class model was identified as optimal based on lowest Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC=42,150.9) after evaluating 1-7 class models
  • Significant demographic differences were confirmed across classes (χ² p<0.001 for gender, age, race, ethnicity, education and income distributions)
  • Class 1: lower-income, predominantly Hispanic young to middle-aged adults (n=499, 13.2%); Class 2: lower-income, older, predominantly Black non-Hispanic (n=1828, 48.2%); Class 3: middle-aged, high-income non-Hispanic (n=599, 15.8%); Class 4: young to middle-aged, highly educated, high-income non-Hispanic (n=865, 22.8%)
  • Sensitivity analysis using four age groups yielded higher BIC (45,430.8) than the three age group primary model (BIC=42,150.9), confirming the primary model

Class 1 (lower-income, predominantly Hispanic young to middle-aged adults) exhibited significantly worse anxiety and cognitive function compared to the reference group at both 3 and 6 months post-infection.

  • Class 1 showed significantly worse 3-month anxiety compared to the reference Class 3 (β=4.41, 95% CI 3.25 to 5.56, p<0.001)
  • Class 1 showed significantly worse 3-month cognitive function (β=-3.29, 95% CI -4.77 to -1.82, p<0.001)
  • Worse outcomes were observed across physical and mental health domains at both 3-month and 6-month follow-ups
  • Reference group (Class 3) was middle-aged, high-income non-Hispanic adults (n=599)

Class 2 (lower-income, older, predominantly Black non-Hispanic adults) showed significantly worse depression, cognitive function, and higher odds of missed workdays compared to the reference group.

  • Class 2 showed significantly worse 3-month depression compared to the reference Class 3 (β=3.58, 95% CI 2.53 to 4.64, p<0.001)
  • Class 2 had significantly higher odds of missed workdays (>1 week) at 6 months (OR=1.853, 95% CI 1.192 to 2.880, p=0.006)
  • Class 2 exhibited significantly worse cognitive function at both 3-month and 6-month time points
  • Class 2 was the largest subgroup, comprising 48.2% of the study sample (n=1828)

Class 4 (young to middle-aged, highly educated, high-income non-Hispanic adults) consistently reported the most favorable health outcomes post-COVID-19 infection.

  • Class 4 reported better physical function at 3 months compared to the reference group (β=2.04, p<0.001)
  • Class 4 reported lower pain interference compared to the reference group
  • Class 4 comprised 22.8% of the study sample (n=865)
  • Class 4 showed consistently favorable outcomes across physical and mental health domains at both follow-up time points

The INSPIRE registry enrolled 3791 eligible participants with the majority being young to middle-aged, female, white, and non-Hispanic.

  • Of 3791 eligible participants with complete baseline data, 2897 (76.4%) completed the 3-month follow-up and 2666 (70.3%) completed the 6-month follow-up
  • Most participants were aged 18-49 years (74-75%), female (66-67%), white (86.6-87.5%), and non-Hispanic (86.6-87.5%)
  • Participants were enrolled from 9 December 2020 to 12 August 2022 across eight US academic medical centres
  • Eligible participants were adults ≥18 years, fluent in English or Spanish, with confirmed positive SARS-CoV-2 test within 42 days before enrolment

Health outcome disparities between SDOH subgroups persisted at both 3-month and 6-month follow-up time points post-SARS-CoV-2 infection.

  • Primary outcomes included PROMIS-29 V.2.1 T-scores for depression, anxiety, fatigue, sleep disturbance, pain interference, physical function, and social participation
  • Cognitive function was measured using PROMIS Cognitive Function Short Form 8 T-scores
  • Missed workdays were assessed as a binary outcome (>1 week vs ≤1 week) via single-item survey
  • All measures were self-reported and collected at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months
  • Classes 1 and 2 exhibited significantly worse outcomes across multiple physical and mental health domains at both time points compared to the reference group

What This Means

This research examined how social and economic factors — such as income, race, ethnicity, age, and education — grouped together to affect recovery from COVID-19. Using data from over 3,700 adults enrolled in the INSPIRE registry across eight US medical centers, researchers identified four distinct groups of people with different combinations of social circumstances. They then tracked how these groups fared over 3 and 6 months after COVID-19 infection in terms of physical health, mental health, thinking and memory, and ability to return to work. The study found that people in lower-income groups — particularly those who were predominantly Hispanic or predominantly Black — consistently experienced worse mental health (higher depression and anxiety), worse physical health, greater difficulties with thinking and memory, and more missed workdays compared to higher-income, white non-Hispanic adults. For example, lower-income Hispanic adults had notably higher anxiety scores at 3 months, and lower-income older Black adults had nearly twice the odds of missing more than a week of work at 6 months. In contrast, younger, highly educated, high-income non-Hispanic adults reported the best health outcomes across almost all measures. This research suggests that social and economic disadvantages — not just the virus itself — play a major role in how well people recover from COVID-19. The persistent nature of these disparities at both 3 and 6 months indicates that the effects are not short-lived. These findings point to the importance of addressing systemic inequities — such as access to healthcare, financial resources, and workplace flexibility — when designing public health responses and support programs for people recovering from COVID-19 and similar illnesses.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Burrola-Mendez Y, Lin E, Parrish C, Hsu C, Hill M, Gottlieb M, et al.. (2026). Identifying social determinants of health subgroups and their associations with health outcomes in a prospective US adult COVID-19 cohort: an analysis of the INSPIRE registry.. BMJ open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105749