Body Composition

Impact of overweight and obesity on fasting insulin secretion in men and women without diabetes: effect sizes and mechanisms.

TL;DR

The effect of body mass on insulin secretion is continuous, more pronounced in men, driven by fat mass and waist, sustained by hyperglycaemia and by an upregulation of beta cell insulin secretion, and is only partially explained by typical hormonal and metabolic consequences of obesity.

Key Findings

Fat mass and waist circumference were the strongest adiposity predictors of fasting insulin secretion among all adiposity indices examined.

  • Fat mass had a standardised β coefficient (Stβ) of 0.27 (p<0.0001)
  • Waist circumference had a Stβ of 0.21 (p<0.0001)
  • Other adiposity indices including BMI, body fat percentage, and WHR were also evaluated
  • Analysis was performed in 1250 healthy participants (547 men, 703 women) from the EGIR-RISC cohort

Fasting insulin secretion increased 2.4-fold across BMI deciles in the study population.

  • The impact of obesity on fasting insulin secretion (FIS) was continuous across the full spectrum of BMI values
  • The dose-response relationship was also continuous across the full spectrum of WHR values
  • Participants had BMI ranging from 18.5 to 40.0 kg/m²
  • Age range was 30–60 years

The effect of obesity on fasting insulin secretion was greater in men than in women.

  • Sex-related differences in the relationship between body mass and insulin secretion were observed
  • The cohort included 547 men and 703 women
  • Multivariable regression models and stratifications for BMI, body fat percentage, WHR, and fat mass were used to evaluate these effects

Adiposity-associated insulin hypersecretion appeared to be driven by the combination of hyperglycaemia and an increase in insulin secretion rate at 5 mmol/l glucose (ISR@5).

  • ISR@5 is a specific beta cell function variable representing insulin secretion rate at 5 mmol/l glucose
  • Beta cell function was modelled from an OGTT combined with clamp-derived insulin sensitivity
  • This combination of hyperglycaemia and upregulated beta cell secretion sustained the observed fasting hyperinsulinaemia

Weight gain over 3.5-year follow-up was associated with increases in fasting insulin secretion and fasting glucose, while weight loss reduced both.

  • Weight gainers had a mean ± SD Δweight of +5.1 ± 3.8 kg and showed increased FIS and fasting glucose (+0.20 ± 0.63 mmol/l, p<0.03)
  • Weight losers had a mean Δweight of −4.7 ± 2.8 kg and showed reduced FIS and fasting glucose (+0.06 ± 0.55 mmol/l, p<0.006)
  • ISR@5 declined in both weight losers (−0.17 ± 1.9 U/h, p<0.002) and those with stable weight (−0.16 ± 1.0 U/h, p<0.002) but not in weight gainers (−0.06 ± 1.1 U/h)
  • Follow-up duration was 3.5 years

Peripheral insulin resistance, plasma NEFA, and leptin accounted for only part of obesity's effect on fasting insulin secretion.

  • These typical hormonal and metabolic consequences of obesity did not fully explain the observed insulin hypersecretion
  • Clamp-derived insulin sensitivity was used to assess peripheral insulin resistance
  • The analysis was conducted in the full cohort of 1250 participants

Subset analysis of endogenous glucose production (EGP) data suggested progressive hepatic glucose overproduction across fat mass quintiles despite a preserved hepatic insulin response.

  • EGP was measured in a subset of 368 participants using fasting and clamp methods
  • The data indicated a rightward shift in the dose-response curve across fat mass quintiles
  • This pattern was interpreted as progressive hepatic glucose overproduction despite preserved hepatic insulin response
  • The authors suggest hepatic glucose overproduction contributes to fasting hyperinsulinaemia in obesity

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Chiriac&#xf2; M, Tric&#xf2; D, Petrie J, Gabriel R, Gastaldelli A, Nolan J, et al.. (2026). Impact of overweight and obesity on fasting insulin secretion in men and women without diabetes: effect sizes and mechanisms.. Diabetologia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-025-06643-9