Implications for sustaining secondary prophylaxis for rheumatic heart disease in Ethiopia: Uptake and determinants in a multicentre cross-sectional study.
Birru E, Birru Z, et al. • PLoS neglected tropical diseases • 2026
Approximately three-quarters of participants achieved ≥80% BPG uptake, and geographic access, longer prophylaxis duration, injection pain, and limited family support were important correlates of lower uptake in this multicentre cross-sectional study of rheumatic heart disease in Ethiopia.
Key Findings
Results
Overall BPG uptake of ≥80% was achieved by 76.3% of participants with RHD in Ethiopia.
305 out of 400 participants achieved ≥80% BPG uptake.
The study was conducted across three referral hospitals in Ethiopia between November 2023 and November 2024.
All participants had echocardiography-confirmed RHD.
The ≥80% threshold was used as the definition of 'high uptake' throughout the analysis.
Results
Living more than 50 km from an RHD follow-up facility was strongly associated with lower BPG uptake compared with living less than 30 km away.
aOR 0.10 (95% CI 0.04–0.22) for living >50 km versus <30 km from facility.
Rural residence was associated with lower uptake than urban residence (aOR 0.28, 95% CI 0.14–0.52).
Suburban residence was also associated with lower uptake than urban residence (aOR 0.42, 95% CI 0.19–0.93).
Geographic access was identified as one of the most important correlates of lower uptake.
Results
Longer duration of prophylaxis was progressively associated with lower BPG uptake compared with 12–24 months of treatment.
2–3 years of prophylaxis: aOR 0.26 (95% CI 0.11–0.56) compared with 12–24 months.
3–4 years of prophylaxis: aOR 0.26 (95% CI 0.10–0.61) compared with 12–24 months.
More than 4 years of prophylaxis: aOR 0.07 (95% CI 0.03–0.15) compared with 12–24 months.
The association showed a progressive decline in uptake odds with longer treatment duration.
Results
Frequent injection pain was associated with lower BPG uptake.
aOR 0.32 (95% CI 0.17–0.59) for frequent injection pain.
Injection pain was identified as a treatment-related factor evaluated in the logistic regression analysis.
The finding suggests injection acceptability may be a modifiable barrier to adherence.
Results
Family support was associated with higher BPG uptake.
aOR 2.89 (95% CI 1.24–6.71) for family support.
Family support was classified as a healthcare-service and treatment-related factor in the analysis.
This was one of two factors positively associated with high uptake identified in the study.
Results
Male sex was associated with higher BPG uptake compared with female sex.
aOR 2.64 (95% CI 1.62–4.42) for males versus females.
Sex was evaluated as a demographic factor in the logistic regression.
This finding suggests a gender disparity in secondary prophylaxis adherence.
Results
Increasing age was associated with decreased odds of high BPG uptake.
aOR per 10-year increase in age: 0.80 (95% CI 0.69–0.94).
Age was evaluated as a demographic factor using logistic regression.
The association was assessed per 10-year increment in age.
Results
Achieving ≥80% BPG uptake was associated with substantially lower odds of reported recurrent acute rheumatic fever (ARF) manifestations.
aOR 0.25 (95% CI 0.14–0.44) for recurrent ARF manifestations among those with ≥80% uptake.
Recurrent ARF manifestations were self-reported by participants.
This finding supports the clinical rationale for maintaining high secondary prophylaxis uptake to prevent recurrent ARF and progressive valve damage.
Methods
The study used a multicentre facility-based cross-sectional design with logistic regression and exposure-specific confounder adjustment sets.
400 participants were enrolled across three referral hospitals in Ethiopia.
Echocardiography-confirmed RHD was required for study inclusion.
Adjustment sets were selected according to plausible confounding relationships rather than a single fully adjusted model.
Analysis was conducted using R version 4.6.1.
Demographic, socioeconomic, geographic, healthcare-service, and treatment-related factors were evaluated.
What This Means
This research suggests that while about three-quarters of people with rheumatic heart disease (RHD) in Ethiopia received at least 80% of their recommended penicillin injections (called benzathine penicillin G or BPG), a significant proportion still fell short of this target. RHD is a serious heart condition caused by repeated episodes of rheumatic fever, and regular monthly penicillin injections are the standard way to prevent further episodes and worsening heart damage. The study surveyed 400 patients attending three major hospitals in Ethiopia over one year and found that where people live, how long they have been on treatment, pain from injections, and whether they have family support all played important roles in whether they kept up with their injections.
Geographic barriers stood out as particularly important: people living more than 50 km from a clinic were about 90% less likely to achieve high uptake compared to those living within 30 km, and people in rural and suburban areas also fared worse than urban residents. Adherence also declined dramatically the longer someone had been on treatment — those on prophylaxis for more than four years were 93% less likely to maintain high uptake compared to those who had been on it for one to two years. Women, older patients, and those experiencing frequent injection pain were also less likely to maintain adequate uptake, while patients with family support were nearly three times more likely to do so. Critically, patients who did maintain high uptake were 75% less likely to report symptoms of recurrent rheumatic fever, reinforcing why consistent treatment matters.
This research suggests that making penicillin injections available closer to where patients live (decentralised delivery), finding ways to make injections less painful, and strengthening family and community support systems could all help improve long-term adherence to this life-saving treatment in Ethiopia and similar high-burden settings. The progressive drop-off in adherence over time also highlights the need for sustained engagement strategies, not just at the start of treatment but throughout what can be a decade-long or lifelong course of prophylaxis.
Birru E, Birru Z, Belayneh Y, Alemu M, Oliver J, Kebede Z. (2026). Implications for sustaining secondary prophylaxis for rheumatic heart disease in Ethiopia: Uptake and determinants in a multicentre cross-sectional study.. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0014703