Noise control care was associated with reduced anxiety and depression, improved sleep quality, and superior clinical outcomes in patients with ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction.
Key Findings
Results
The noise control group experienced significantly lower environmental noise levels than the standard care group at both daytime and nighttime.
Noise metrics measured included LAeq, LAmin, and LAmax
Differences were statistically significant at P < 0.001
Noise reduction measures were implemented as an addition to standard care for patients admitted July–December 2023
The standard care group received conventional ward care without noise reduction measures
Results
Both groups showed improved anxiety and depression scores by Day 7, but the noise control group demonstrated significantly greater reductions in HAMA and HAMD scores.
Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) were assessed at baseline and Day 7
Both groups showed improvement over time, indicating some baseline effect of care
The noise control group's reductions were significantly greater than the standard care group (P < 0.001)
Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups
Results
Sleep quality as measured by the Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ) was significantly higher in the noise control group across all five domains and total score.
RCSQ scores were significantly higher in the noise control group for all five individual domains
Total RCSQ score differences were statistically significant at P < 0.001
The noise control group comprised 84 patients; the standard care group comprised 63 patients
Results
The noise control group exhibited improved haemodynamic stability, with significantly reduced heart rate and blood pressure on Day 7.
Both heart rate and blood pressure were significantly lower in the noise control group at Day 7 compared to the standard care group (P < 0.001)
Haemodynamic measurements were included as outcome indicators alongside psychological and sleep measures
Results
The incidence of delirium was significantly lower in the noise control group compared to the standard care group.
Delirium incidence was 10.71% in the noise control group versus 25.40% in the standard care group
The difference was statistically significant at P < 0.05
This represents a reduction of approximately 58% in delirium incidence with noise control measures
Results
The noise control group had a significantly shorter duration of mechanical ventilation and hospital length of stay.
Duration of mechanical ventilation was significantly reduced in the noise control group (P < 0.001)
Hospital length of stay was also significantly shorter in the noise control group (P < 0.05)
These clinical outcomes were measured alongside psychological, sleep, and haemodynamic indicators
Methods
This was a retrospective study of 147 patients with ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction (VIDD) grouped by admission period rather than randomization.
Standard care group: n = 63, admitted January–June 2023
Noise control group: n = 84, admitted July–December 2023
Grouping was based on admission period, introducing potential for temporal confounding
Both groups had comparable baseline characteristics
What This Means
This research suggests that actively reducing noise levels in hospital wards can meaningfully benefit patients who are on mechanical ventilators and have developed a condition called ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction (VIDD), where the breathing muscle weakens due to prolonged ventilator use. The study compared 147 patients — some receiving standard care and others receiving additional noise reduction measures — and found that patients in quieter environments had less anxiety and depression, slept better, and had more stable heart rate and blood pressure after one week of care.
Beyond psychological and sleep benefits, the noise reduction approach was also linked to better clinical outcomes. Patients in the noise control group were about 2.4 times less likely to develop delirium (a state of confusion common in ICU patients), spent less time on mechanical ventilation, and were discharged from the hospital sooner. These findings suggest that something as seemingly simple as managing the sound environment in a ward could have wide-ranging effects on both the mental and physical recovery of critically ill patients.
It is important to note that this was a retrospective study where patients were grouped by the time period they were admitted rather than being randomly assigned to conditions, which means other factors that changed over those time periods could have influenced the results. Nevertheless, this research suggests that noise control interventions deserve attention as a low-cost, non-invasive component of care for patients requiring mechanical ventilation.
Qiu Z, Zhang W, Yan Z. (2026). Influence of Ward Noise on Emotional State and Sleep Quality in Patients with Ventilator-induced Diaphragmatic Dysfunction.. Noise & health. https://doi.org/10.4103/nah.nah_163_25