Aging & Longevity

Interventions for promoting physical activity and reducing sedentary time among people aged 55 years and older: an overview of systematic reviews.

TL;DR

Consistent evidence suggests that technology-based interventions are effective in increasing physical activity, step counts and MVPA among adults aged 55 years and older, whereas inconsistent findings support the effectiveness of exercise and behavioural interventions in increasing physical activity.

Key Findings

A total of 21 systematic reviews were included, with the majority being of low or critically low methodological quality.

  • 21 systematic reviews were identified from searches of five electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane and SportDiscus)
  • 17 of the 21 included reviews conducted meta-analyses
  • Seven reviews were of moderate quality, 11 were of low quality, and three were of critically low quality as assessed using the AMSTAR-2 tool
  • Reviews focused on interventions for adults aged 55 years or older

Technology-based interventions demonstrated consistent evidence of significant increases in physical activity among older adults.

  • Six of seven meta-analyses of technology-based interventions demonstrated significant increases in physical activity
  • All five meta-analyses examining step counts reported significant improvements
  • Four of five meta-analyses showed significant benefits for MVPA (moderate to vigorous physical activity)
  • Two meta-analyses reported inconsistent findings on sedentary time for technology-based interventions

Exercise and behavioural interventions showed inconsistent effects on physical activity among older adults.

  • Six meta-analyses of exercise and behavioural interventions examined physical activity after 12 months
  • Two meta-analyses reported a significant difference in physical activity after 12 months
  • Two meta-analyses found no significant difference in physical activity
  • Two meta-analyses presented mixed findings across subgroups
  • Only one meta-analysis reported an effect on sedentary time and observed no significant improvement

The authors' own meta-analyses partially supported the findings from the included systematic reviews.

  • Meta-analyses of original studies were conducted to explore the effect of different types of intervention on outcomes in the short and intermediate term
  • Results from the authors' meta-analyses were described as 'partially supported' by the results from included reviews
  • Analyses were grouped by intervention type (e.g., technology-based, exercise and behavioural) and outcome measure (e.g., total physical activity, step counts, MVPA, sedentary time)

Limited evidence exists examining interventions specifically designed to reduce sedentary time in older adults.

  • Physical inactivity and prolonged sedentary behaviours are described as common among older adults, leading to increased risk of chronic diseases and mortality
  • Only one meta-analysis of exercise and behavioural interventions reported an effect on sedentary time and observed no significant improvement
  • Two meta-analyses of technology-based interventions reported inconsistent findings on sedentary time
  • The authors concluded that 'future research targeting sedentary behaviours is needed'

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Tang Q, Shan S, Chen H, Zhou W. (2026). Interventions for promoting physical activity and reducing sedentary time among people aged 55 years and older: an overview of systematic reviews.. Age and ageing. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afag045