Leisure-time and commuting physical activity and subsequent sickness absence among young and early midlife employees: a register-linked follow-up study 2017-2020.
Päivärinne V, Fagerlund P, et al. • International archives of occupational and environmental health • 2026
Leisure-time physical activity including vigorous-intensity activity was associated with lower sickness absence over the follow-up, although patterns differed by sex and activity level, and vigorous-intensity physical activity may be beneficial for reducing sickness absence already in early working life.
Key Findings
Results
Women had significantly more sickness absence days than men over the follow-up period.
Women averaged 135 sickness absence days per 10 person-years compared to 97 days for men.
This difference was statistically significant (p<0.001).
The study population consisted of City of Helsinki employees aged 19-39 surveyed in 2017.
Sickness absence was tracked from 2017 to 2020 using register-based data.
Results
Women with moderate-to-vigorous leisure-time physical activity had lower rates of total sickness absence compared to inactive women.
The incidence rate ratio (IRR) for total sickness absence days was 0.69 (95% CI 0.60-0.80) for women with moderate-to-vigorous LTPA compared to inactive women.
This association held after full adjustment for sociodemographic and lifestyle covariates.
Protective associations were also observed for both short-term and long-term sickness absence spells in women.
LTPA was assessed as weekly metabolic equivalent (MET) hours in 2017 and categorized into five groups: inactivity, moderate, moderate-to-vigorous, vigorous, and high vigorous.
The LTPA analysis included n=3,618 participants.
Results
Men with vigorous leisure-time physical activity had lower rates of total sickness absence days and short sickness absence spells compared to inactive men.
The IRR for total sickness absence days was 0.60 (95% CI 0.44-0.81) for men with vigorous LTPA compared to inactive men.
The protective association for men also extended to short sickness absence spells after adjustment.
No significant protective association was confirmed for men at moderate-to-vigorous LTPA levels, unlike in women.
Analyses were stratified by sex and used negative binomial regression to estimate IRRs and 95% CIs.
Results
Active commuting showed protective associations with sickness absence only among women, with no confirmed associations among men.
Active commuting (AC) was assessed as weekly MET hours and categorized into four groups: inactive, low moderate, moderate-to-vigorous, and vigorous.
The AC analysis included n=3,513 participants.
Overall, associations for AC were described as weaker compared to those for leisure-time physical activity.
No protective associations for AC were confirmed among men after adjustment.
Results
The protective associations between physical activity and sickness absence differed by both sex and level of physical activity.
Women showed protective associations at the moderate-to-vigorous LTPA level, while men required vigorous-intensity LTPA for confirmed protection.
The study used a prospective register-linked design with a 2017 baseline survey linked to 2017-2020 sickness absence register data.
Analyses were adjusted for sociodemographic and lifestyle factors using negative binomial regression.
Sickness absence outcomes included total SA, short-term SA, and long-term SA spells.
What This Means
This research examined whether physical activity during leisure time and active commuting (such as cycling or walking to work) was associated with taking fewer sick days among young workers aged 19 to 39 employed by the City of Helsinki. Using survey data from 2017 linked to official sickness absence records through 2020, the study found that women who engaged in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in their leisure time had about 31% fewer sickness absence days compared to inactive women. Men showed a similar benefit, but only at higher (vigorous) intensity levels, with about 40% fewer sickness absence days compared to inactive men. These findings suggest that regular physical activity—particularly at higher intensities—may help reduce workplace absenteeism even among younger employees early in their careers.
The study also found that women had substantially more sickness absence days overall than men (135 vs. 97 days per 10 person-years). Active commuting showed some protective associations, but these were only confirmed in women and were generally weaker than the leisure-time physical activity findings. This suggests that the type and intensity of physical activity may matter differently depending on sex, and that leisure-time exercise may be more consistently beneficial than active commuting for reducing sick days.
This research suggests that promoting vigorous-intensity physical activity among younger working adults could be a meaningful strategy for reducing sickness absence in the workplace. The fact that protective effects were seen even in this younger age group—before the typical accumulation of chronic health problems—highlights the potential value of encouraging active lifestyles early in working life. However, the different patterns seen between men and women indicate that one-size-fits-all activity recommendations may not capture the full picture.
Check Your Own Numbers
Upload your bloodwork. We'll cross-reference your results against this study and 4,700 others.
Päivärinne V, Fagerlund P, Lahti J, Rahkonen O, Lallukka T. (2026). Leisure-time and commuting physical activity and subsequent sickness absence among young and early midlife employees: a register-linked follow-up study 2017-2020.. International archives of occupational and environmental health. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-026-02234-2