In 55 patients with intracranial hemorrhage and invasive ICP monitoring, repeated daily ONSD measurements were only weakly associated with ICP (explaining under 2% of variance), which questions ONSD's reliability as a stand-alone tool for serial monitoring of dynamic ICP changes.
Key Findings
Results
The prespecified primary analysis found no significant association between ICP and bilateral mean inner-reflection ONSD (irONSD) at 3 mm.
β = 0.004 mm per mmHg, 95% CI -0.003 to 0.011; p = 0.169.
Marginal R² = 0.3%.
This was a prospective longitudinal study with daily ONSD measurements compared with simultaneously recorded invasive ICP.
Results
At 6 mm behind the optic disc, a small but statistically significant association between ICP and outer-reflection ONSD was detected for bilateral mean values.
β = 0.010, 95% CI 0.002-0.019; p = 0.016.
Marginal R² = 1.3%.
The effect size was small, so ICP explained very little of ONSD variance.
Results
Overall, the association between ICP and ONSD was weak, with ICP explaining less than 2% of ONSD variance in this cohort.
55 patients with intracranial hemorrhage were included.
Repeated measurements were obtained over a mean of 5.47 ± 2.27 days.
ONSD was measured by transorbital ultrasound at 3 mm and 6 mm posterior to the optic disc.
Discussion
The cohort was treated neurocritical care patients with predominantly controlled ICP, which may have limited ONSD variation and the ability to detect association.
The authors describe the cohort as 'treated cohort with predominantly controlled ICP'.
The findings relate to the ability of ONSD to track dynamic ICP changes over time in treated patients.
Conclusions
The authors conclude that ONSD should not be interpreted as a direct substitute for invasive ICP or as a stand-alone measure of short-term ICP change.
The findings question ONSD's reliability as a stand-alone tool for serial monitoring of dynamic ICP changes.
Background concerns cited include substantial variability in measurement techniques and cut-off values.
What This Means
This study looked at whether an ultrasound measurement of the optic nerve sheath, taken through the closed eyelid, could stand in for invasive pressure monitoring inside the skull in patients with bleeding in the brain. Researchers measured the optic nerve sheath diameter daily in 55 patients, for about five days on average, and compared it with pressure readings from a monitor placed in the head.
The link between the two was weak. At one measurement location (3 mm behind the optic disc), there was no significant association. At another (6 mm), there was a small statistical link, but pressure explained only about 1% of the variation in the nerve sheath size, and under 2% in the cohort overall. The patients were being actively treated and their pressure was mostly under control, which may have made changes harder to detect.
This research suggests that the optic nerve sheath ultrasound measurement should not be relied on alone to track day-to-day changes in pressure inside the skull in treated intensive care patients, and it is not a replacement for invasive monitoring. It might still have other uses, but this study does not support it as a stand-alone monitoring tool.
Ahmad B, Trappe M, Harnisch L, Moerer O, Allam I, Kück F, et al.. (2026). Limited utility of optic nerve sheath diameter for monitoring intracranial pressure in patients with intracranial hemorrhage.. Frontiers in neurology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2026.1932373