Cardiovascular

Machine learning-based models to predict 90-day non-excellent functional outcomes among patients with mild acute ischemic stroke after intravenous thrombolysis.

TL;DR

A machine learning model (XGBoost) using six routinely available predictors was developed and internally validated to predict 90-day non-excellent functional outcomes in patients with mild acute ischemic stroke after intravenous thrombolysis, showing promising predictive performance and potential utility for early risk stratification.

Key Findings

About one quarter of patients with mild acute ischemic stroke treated with intravenous thrombolysis had a non-excellent functional outcome at 90 days.

  • 507 patients with mild acute ischemic stroke who received intravenous thrombolysis were included.
  • 136 patients (26.8%) experienced a non-excellent functional outcome at 90 days.
  • Data were retrospectively collected at Tianjin Fourth Central Hospital between January 2024 and June 2025.

LASSO regression selected six predictors of 90-day non-excellent functional outcome.

  • The selected predictors were age, baseline NIHSS score, platelet count, monocyte count, blood glucose level, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio.
  • Candidate variables included demographic, clinical, laboratory, and neuroimaging data extracted from electronic medical records.

XGBoost achieved the highest numerical discrimination among seven machine learning models in the validation cohort.

  • Validation AUC was 0.753 (95% CI, 0.660-0.840).
  • Seven machine learning models were developed and compared.
  • The model was described as showing adequate calibration and clinical usefulness.

Model performance was evaluated across multiple dimensions, and SHAP analysis was used to interpret predictor contributions.

  • Assessment covered discrimination, calibration, clinical utility, and classification metrics.
  • SHAP analysis was used to show the relative importance and direction of association of each predictor with model predictions.

The study concludes that the XGBoost model is promising for early risk stratification, though it was validated only internally.

  • The model was developed and internally validated in a single-center retrospective cohort.
  • The authors describe the AUC as the highest 'numerical' value, suggesting differences among models may not be definitive.

What This Means

This study looked at patients who had a mild ischemic stroke (caused by a blocked blood vessel in the brain) and received clot-busting treatment. Even with treatment, about 27% of the 507 patients in this hospital in Tianjin, China, did not recover to an excellent level of function after 90 days. The researchers wanted a tool to identify these patients early. Using hospital records, they tested seven machine learning methods and found six factors that were most useful for prediction: age, stroke severity on arrival (NIHSS score), platelet count, monocyte count (a type of white blood cell), blood glucose, and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (a blood marker of inflammation). The best-performing method, called XGBoost, had an AUC of 0.753 in the validation group, which indicates moderate ability to tell apart patients who would and would not have an excellent recovery. This research suggests that simple, routinely collected information could help flag patients at higher risk of a poorer recovery after mild stroke. However, the study came from a single hospital, was retrospective, and was only internally validated, so the model would need testing in other settings before it could be considered for routine use.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Wang Y, Qiu X, Wang Y, Wang L. (2026). Machine learning-based models to predict 90-day non-excellent functional outcomes among patients with mild acute ischemic stroke after intravenous thrombolysis.. Frontiers in neurology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2026.1960403