Machine learning-based prediction of peripherally inserted central catheter-related thrombosis in hematological malignancies: development and validation of a dynamic model in a multicenter cohort.
Su J, Hu J, et al. • Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer • 2026
An XGBoost machine learning model integrating dynamic biomarkers and hematology-specific factors provided superior personalized risk stratification for PICC-related thrombosis in hematological malignancy patients, achieving an AUC of 0.862 in independent validation and outperforming logistic regression.
Key Findings
Results
The incidence of symptomatic PICC-related thrombosis in the study cohort was 5.8%.
232 symptomatic PICC-RT events were identified among 4015 included patients.
The study screened 5420 patients and ultimately included adult patients with hematological malignancies who underwent PICC insertion across five participating centers.
The cohort was partitioned into a training set (n=2810) and an independent testing set (n=1205).
Results
The XGBoost model significantly outperformed logistic regression in predicting PICC-related thrombosis on the independent testing set.
XGBoost achieved an AUC of 0.862 (95% CI: 0.825–0.899) versus logistic regression AUC of 0.774 (95% CI: 0.730–0.818).
The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001).
Three algorithms were compared: logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), and XGBoost, evaluated using AUC, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA).
Results
Nine core predictors of PICC-related thrombosis were identified via LASSO regression.
Independent predictors included history of VTE, use of triple-lumen catheters, immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) use, and peak values of D-dimer and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR).
LASSO regression was used for variable selection from the broader set of clinical and laboratory features.
The model integrated both static clinical data and dynamic biomarkers to provide individualized risk prediction.
Results
SHAP analysis revealed a distinct threshold effect for peak D-dimer, where thrombosis risk accelerated sharply once levels exceeded 1.5 mg/L.
SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were utilized for model interpretation.
The threshold effect for D-dimer at 1.5 mg/L was identified as a clinically meaningful inflection point for risk escalation.
SHAP analysis provided individualized feature contribution estimates, supporting clinical interpretability of the model.
Results
The XGBoost model demonstrated a high negative predictive value of 98.6% alongside a positive predictive value of 18.8%.
The authors attributed the pattern of high NPV and lower PPV to the low baseline incidence of PICC-RT (5.8%).
The model was described as providing 'a balanced predictive profile given the low baseline incidence.'
This performance profile was framed as enabling safe identification of low-risk individuals while flagging high-risk patients for enhanced surveillance.
Background
Traditional risk assessment models were characterized as static and lacking hematology-specific predictors, motivating the development of a dynamic ML model.
The authors noted that 'traditional risk assessment models are often static and lack hematology-specific predictors, resulting in suboptimal performance.'
The study design incorporated both static clinical features and dynamic longitudinal biomarkers (peak D-dimer, peak NLR) to address this limitation.
This was a multicenter retrospective study across five participating centers.
Results
An open-access web-based risk calculator was developed to facilitate clinical application of the XGBoost model.
The calculator is freely available at https://xxcc1114.shinyapps.io/PICC_Calculator/
The tool was designed to enable identification of high-risk patients who may benefit from 'enhanced surveillance or targeted thromboprophylaxis.'
The web-based format was intended to support real-world clinical deployment of the model.
What This Means
This research suggests that a machine learning model called XGBoost can accurately predict which patients with blood cancers are most likely to develop dangerous blood clots related to their peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs)—thin tubes placed in a vein to deliver chemotherapy. Among more than 4,000 patients studied across five hospitals, about 1 in 17 developed this type of clot. The XGBoost model, which combined fixed patient characteristics (like prior clot history and catheter type) with lab values that change over time (like D-dimer and a white blood cell ratio), was significantly more accurate than a standard statistical approach, correctly identifying high- and low-risk patients with an AUC of 0.862.
One particularly notable finding was that D-dimer levels above 1.5 mg/L were associated with a sharp jump in clot risk, suggesting a potential clinical threshold for heightened vigilance. The model was especially good at ruling out low-risk patients—nearly 99% of those the model flagged as low-risk truly did not develop a clot—though its ability to confirm high-risk cases was more limited, which is expected given how relatively uncommon the complication is. The researchers also identified specific risk factors including prior venous clots, use of triple-lumen catheters, and use of immunomodulatory drugs.
This research matters because PICC-related clots can interrupt cancer treatment and cause serious harm, yet current risk tools are not well-tailored to blood cancer patients. The study's authors built a free, web-based calculator using this model, which clinicians could potentially use to identify patients who need closer monitoring or preventive treatment, while avoiding unnecessary interventions in those at low risk.
Su J, Hu J, Wang W, Lai Z, Su J, Wu Y. (2026). Machine learning-based prediction of peripherally inserted central catheter-related thrombosis in hematological malignancies: development and validation of a dynamic model in a multicenter cohort.. Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-026-11084-0