Maskerading Bundle Branch Block Versus Standard Bifascicular Block: A Prognostic Analysis Results Through Electrophysiological Study.
Tavares de Albuquerque A, Coutinho Vaz de Lira C, et al. • Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc • 2026
Masquerading bundle branch block (MBBB) is associated with more severe myocardial and conduction system impairment compared to standard bifascicular bundle branch block (SBBB), supporting its role as a marker of worse prognosis.
Key Findings
Results
Patients with MBBB had significantly longer HV intervals compared to patients with standard bifascicular block.
HV interval was 66.3 ± 18.3 ms in Group I (MBBB) versus 52.9 ± 8.1 ms in Group II (SBBB).
The difference was statistically significant (p = 0.006).
HV interval prolongation indicates impaired conduction through the His-Purkinje system.
All patients underwent invasive electrophysiological study (EPS) as part of the evaluation protocol.
Results
Pacemaker implantation was required in nearly half of MBBB patients and in none of the SBBB patients.
48% of Group I (MBBB) patients required pacemaker implantation versus 0% in Group II (SBBB).
The difference was statistically significant (p = 0.001).
Group I comprised 27 patients and Group II comprised 18 patients.
This finding supports MBBB as a condition with higher need for pacemaker implantation.
Results
Persistent atrial fibrillation was more frequent in MBBB patients than in SBBB patients.
Persistent atrial fibrillation occurred in 39.5% of Group I (MBBB) versus 16.6% of Group II (SBBB).
The difference was statistically significant (p = 0.018).
All patients underwent 24-h Holter monitoring as part of the evaluation protocol.
Results
MBBB patients had worse functional status, larger ventricular diameters, and lower ejection fraction compared to SBBB patients.
Group I (MBBB) patients had worse functional status categorized as NYHA class III-IV.
Group I patients had larger ventricular diameters on echocardiography.
Group I patients had lower ejection fraction compared to Group II (SBBB) patients.
All patients underwent echocardiography as part of the standardized evaluation protocol.
The study was designed as a prospective cross-sectional study.
Background
MBBB is a rare variant of bifascicular bundle branch block associated with poor prognosis and higher need for pacemaker implantation, with most prior data limited to case reports and reviews.
The study enrolled 27 patients with MBBB (Group I) and 18 with SBBB (Group II).
Prior to this study, most available data on MBBB were limited to case reports and reviews.
The study used a prospective cross-sectional design with standardized evaluation including echocardiography, 24-h Holter monitoring, and invasive EPS.
MBBB is described as a rare variant of standard bifascicular bundle branch block.
What This Means
This research compared two types of electrical conduction problems in the heart: masquerading bundle branch block (MBBB) and standard bifascicular bundle branch block (SBBB). Both conditions affect how electrical signals travel through the heart's lower chambers, but MBBB has a distinctive and somewhat deceptive appearance on an electrocardiogram. The study followed 27 patients with MBBB and 18 with SBBB, putting all of them through heart ultrasound, 24-hour heart rhythm monitoring, and an invasive electrical testing procedure called an electrophysiological study.
The study found that patients with MBBB were significantly worse off in several measurable ways. Their hearts showed weaker pumping function, larger chamber sizes, and more severe symptoms of heart failure. A specific electrical measurement called the HV interval — which reflects how efficiently signals travel through the heart's wiring system — was notably longer in MBBB patients, indicating more impaired conduction. Nearly half of MBBB patients (48%) needed a pacemaker implanted to keep their heart beating properly, compared to none of the SBBB patients. MBBB patients also had higher rates of persistent atrial fibrillation, an irregular heart rhythm that can increase stroke risk and worsen heart function.
This research suggests that MBBB is not just a variant appearance on a heart tracing but a clinically meaningful signal of more serious underlying heart disease. Because most prior knowledge about MBBB came from isolated case reports, this study — though still relatively small — provides some of the first structured comparative data. The findings indicate that patients identified with MBBB may warrant closer monitoring and earlier consideration of interventions like pacemaker implantation.
Tavares de Albuquerque A, Coutinho Vaz de Lira C, de Carvalho Neto J, Rufino Pereira Silva R, Salviano de Macedo Neto I, Filho D. (2026). Maskerading Bundle Branch Block Versus Standard Bifascicular Block: A Prognostic Analysis Results Through Electrophysiological Study.. Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1111/anec.70235