Cardiovascular

Measurement of blood pressure in European Society of Hypertension Excellence Centres: a survey by the Young Investigators Group of the European Society of Hypertension.

TL;DR

A survey of ESH Excellence Centres reveals considerable discrepancies in blood pressure measurement practices, with substantial non-adherence to recommended guidelines even within highly specialised settings.

Key Findings

Automated electronic devices were the dominant method for office blood pressure measurement across ESH Excellence Centres.

  • Automated electronic devices were used routinely in almost all outpatient facilities (96.7%)
  • Manual auscultatory devices were used in 33.3% of healthcare facilities
  • Among manual auscultatory devices, aneroid devices were used by the majority of participants (73.6%)
  • Mercury sphygmomanometers were still used by 28.8% of respondents

Blood pressure was measured in multiple body positions across centres, with seated position being most common but non-seated positions also frequently used.

  • BP was measured in seated position by 91.7% of respondents
  • Standing position was used by 43.8% of respondents
  • Supine position was used by 32.3% of respondents

Most ESH Excellence Centres performed multiple BP measurements per outpatient visit, with three measurements being the most common practice.

  • 68.8% of respondents performed three BP measurements per outpatient
  • 22.9% of respondents performed two BP measurements per outpatient
  • This indicates variation in adherence to standardized measurement protocols

Home blood pressure monitoring was nearly universally advised by respondents at ESH Excellence Centres.

  • 98.9% of respondents routinely advised home BP monitoring
  • Those advising home BP monitoring provided precise instructions on how to perform the required measurements
  • This represents one of the most consistently guideline-adherent practices identified in the survey

The survey achieved a response rate of 44% from a broad international sample of ESH Excellence Centres.

  • The survey was sent to 216 recipients and 96 responses were collected
  • Response rate was 44%
  • Responses came from 29 different countries
  • The survey comprised 17 items and was conducted over 8 weeks from December 2024 to February 2025
  • The survey was distributed via email by the Young Investigators Group of the European Society of Hypertension (YIG-ESH)

Inaccurate blood pressure measurement practices can lead to significant misclassification and unnecessary treatment.

  • Inaccurate BP readings can lead to significant misclassification, often overestimating BP
  • Overestimation of BP can prompt unnecessary lifelong treatment
  • Office BP measurement is described as 'the cornerstone of hypertension diagnosis and risk stratification'

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Mancusi C, Sinigoj P, Antza C, Belančić A, Motiejunaite J, Tähtisalo H, et al.. (2026). Measurement of blood pressure in European Society of Hypertension Excellence Centres: a survey by the Young Investigators Group of the European Society of Hypertension.. Blood pressure. https://doi.org/10.1080/08037051.2026.2646368