Measurement of blood pressure in European Society of Hypertension Excellence Centres: a survey by the Young Investigators Group of the European Society of Hypertension.
A survey of ESH Excellence Centres reveals considerable discrepancies in blood pressure measurement practices, with substantial non-adherence to recommended guidelines even within highly specialised settings.
Key Findings
Results
Automated electronic devices were the dominant method for office blood pressure measurement across ESH Excellence Centres.
Automated electronic devices were used routinely in almost all outpatient facilities (96.7%)
Manual auscultatory devices were used in 33.3% of healthcare facilities
Among manual auscultatory devices, aneroid devices were used by the majority of participants (73.6%)
Mercury sphygmomanometers were still used by 28.8% of respondents
Results
Blood pressure was measured in multiple body positions across centres, with seated position being most common but non-seated positions also frequently used.
BP was measured in seated position by 91.7% of respondents
Standing position was used by 43.8% of respondents
Supine position was used by 32.3% of respondents
Results
Most ESH Excellence Centres performed multiple BP measurements per outpatient visit, with three measurements being the most common practice.
68.8% of respondents performed three BP measurements per outpatient
22.9% of respondents performed two BP measurements per outpatient
This indicates variation in adherence to standardized measurement protocols
Results
Home blood pressure monitoring was nearly universally advised by respondents at ESH Excellence Centres.
98.9% of respondents routinely advised home BP monitoring
Those advising home BP monitoring provided precise instructions on how to perform the required measurements
This represents one of the most consistently guideline-adherent practices identified in the survey
Methods
The survey achieved a response rate of 44% from a broad international sample of ESH Excellence Centres.
The survey was sent to 216 recipients and 96 responses were collected
Response rate was 44%
Responses came from 29 different countries
The survey comprised 17 items and was conducted over 8 weeks from December 2024 to February 2025
The survey was distributed via email by the Young Investigators Group of the European Society of Hypertension (YIG-ESH)
Background
Inaccurate blood pressure measurement practices can lead to significant misclassification and unnecessary treatment.
Inaccurate BP readings can lead to significant misclassification, often overestimating BP
Overestimation of BP can prompt unnecessary lifelong treatment
Office BP measurement is described as 'the cornerstone of hypertension diagnosis and risk stratification'
Mancusi C, Sinigoj P, Antza C, Belančić A, Motiejunaite J, Tähtisalo H, et al.. (2026). Measurement of blood pressure in European Society of Hypertension Excellence Centres: a survey by the Young Investigators Group of the European Society of Hypertension.. Blood pressure. https://doi.org/10.1080/08037051.2026.2646368