Cardiovascular

Mechanisms of ischaemic strokes and transient ischaemic attacks despite oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation.

TL;DR

Most breakthrough ischaemic stroke/TIA events on oral anticoagulation were either associated with anticoagulant under-exposure or a competing mechanism rather than anticoagulant failure.

Key Findings

The majority of breakthrough IS/TIA events in AF patients on oral anticoagulation were adjudicated as cardioembolic in mechanism.

  • 138 of 179 events (77%) were classified as cardioembolic
  • The remaining 41 events (23%) were attributed to competing (non-cardioembolic) mechanisms
  • Study population included 179 patients, 76/179 (43%) female
  • Data drawn from the fifth Auckland Regional Community Stroke Study (ARCOS V), September 2020 to August 2021

Cardioembolic aetiology was associated with lower rates of good anticoagulant control compared to non-cardioembolic events.

  • Good anticoagulant control was present in 87/138 (63%) of cardioembolic events versus 34/41 (83%) of non-cardioembolic events (p=0.017)
  • Good control was defined as proportion of days covered (PDC) ≥80% for direct oral anticoagulant users or time in therapeutic range (TTR) ≥70% for warfarin users
  • In multivariable analysis, good control was independently associated with higher odds of a non-cardioembolic mechanism (adjusted odds ratio 3.67 [95% CI 1.35–9.99], p=0.011)

Peri-event missed or under-dosing was significantly more common in cardioembolic than non-cardioembolic events.

  • Peri-event missed or under-dosing occurred in 90/138 (65%) of cardioembolic events versus 18/41 (44%) of non-cardioembolic events (p=0.014)
  • Peri-event anticoagulant dosing and intake data were collected from clinical records
  • This suggests that anticoagulant under-exposure, rather than true treatment failure, was a predominant driver of cardioembolic events

Cardioembolic events were associated with younger patients compared to non-cardioembolic events.

  • Median age was 72 years in the cardioembolic group versus 81 years in the non-cardioembolic group
  • Patient characteristics including demographics and comorbidities were compared between groups
  • The study enrolled adults with non-valvular AF who experienced IS or TIA

The study design involved cross-sectional analysis with standardised adjudication of IS/TIA mechanism in a community-based stroke cohort.

  • IS/TIA mechanism was adjudicated using standardised criteria and classified as cardioembolic or non-cardioembolic
  • The study used clinical records to collect data on demographics, comorbidities, and peri-event anticoagulant dosing and intake
  • The cohort was drawn from ARCOS V, a community-based stroke study covering September 2020 to August 2021 in Auckland, New Zealand
  • Anticoagulant adherence was categorised over the months preceding the IS/TIA event

What This Means

This research examined why some people with atrial fibrillation (an irregular heart rhythm that increases stroke risk) still have strokes or mini-strokes (TIAs) even when they are taking blood-thinning medications (anticoagulants). The study looked at 179 patients in Auckland, New Zealand, who had a stroke or TIA while supposedly on anticoagulation therapy. It found that in 77% of cases, the stroke was caused by a blood clot originating from the heart (cardioembolic), while the remaining 23% had other underlying causes unrelated to AF. Importantly, the research found that most of the cardioembolic strokes were linked to patients not taking their medication consistently or missing doses around the time of the event — rather than the medication simply failing to work when taken correctly. Patients with cardioembolic strokes were more likely to have poor medication adherence (63% had good control vs. 83% in the non-cardioembolic group) and were more likely to have missed or under-dosed their anticoagulant in the days around the stroke (65% vs. 44%). When patients had good medication control, they were nearly four times more likely to have a non-cardioembolic (non-AF-related) cause for their stroke. This research suggests that when a person on anticoagulation has a stroke, clinicians should carefully investigate whether the medication was being taken as prescribed before assuming the drug has failed. Many so-called 'breakthrough' strokes may actually reflect gaps in medication adherence rather than true treatment failure. This distinction matters because the appropriate strategy to prevent future strokes differs depending on the underlying cause — reinforcing medication adherence may be more important than simply switching or intensifying anticoagulant therapy in many patients.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Mahawish K, Feigin V, Krishnamurthi R, White H. (2026). Mechanisms of ischaemic strokes and transient ischaemic attacks despite oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation.. The New Zealand medical journal. https://doi.org/10.26635/6965.7380