Sleep

Melatonin Use in Young Children: A Systematic Review.

TL;DR

These findings suggest a global rise in prescriptions without efficacy data on use in children with typical development, underscoring the need to identify strategies to prevent and reduce melatonin use in young children, as well as to improve adherence by pediatricians to evidence-based practice standards.

Key Findings

Melatonin is the leading cause of unsupervised medication exposure and overdose in emergency departments for young children aged 0-6 years.

  • This finding is cited as a key motivation for the systematic review.
  • Observational studies documented rises in overdoses especially in the past decade.
  • Poisoning data were drawn from the US and Portugal.
  • The review covered data from inception to February 26, 2025, across nine databases including Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science.

The systematic review identified 19 articles representing 12 observational studies, 6 experimental trials, and 1 protocol published between 2000 and 2025.

  • Nine databases, two clinical trial registries, existing systematic reviews, and forward and backward citation searches were used.
  • Observational studies reported on a mean of 9 years of data (range 3-21 years) from Nordic or Australian registries or poisoning data.
  • Trials included 167 young children with neurologic conditions.
  • Trials lasted a mean of 12.7 weeks (range: 2 weeks to 2 years).
  • Methodological quality was assessed using the Downs and Black Checklist; quality was poor for 3 studies, fair for 9, and good for 6.

Observational studies documented a global rise in melatonin prescribing practices and extended use in young children, especially over the past decade.

  • Data came from Nordic and Australian registries as well as US and Portuguese poisoning surveillance.
  • The observational studies covered 9 years of data on average (range 3-21 years).
  • Extended use (long-term prescriptions) was specifically noted as a documented trend.
  • Rising overdose rates were also documented in tandem with increased prescribing.

Clinical trials provided evidence for improved sleep onset in young children with neurologic conditions such as autism spectrum disorder, with few adverse events reported.

  • The 6 experimental trials included a total of 167 young children with neurologic conditions.
  • Trials lasted a mean of 12.7 weeks (range: 2 weeks to 2 years).
  • Adverse events were reported as few across the trials.
  • Effectiveness was specifically demonstrated for sleep onset latency improvements.
  • The neurologic conditions studied included autism spectrum disorder as a named example.

No efficacy data were available for melatonin use in young children with typical development.

  • All trial evidence for effectiveness was restricted to children with neurologic conditions.
  • The absence of efficacy data for typically developing young children was identified as a major evidence gap.
  • This gap was highlighted as a key reason to prevent and reduce melatonin use in this population.
  • The review found no data on long-term outcomes for other behaviors and health outcomes beyond sleep onset.

Data regarding long-term outcomes for behaviors and health beyond sleep onset were absent across the included studies.

  • No studies in the review reported long-term outcome data on health or behavioral measures other than sleep onset.
  • This was identified for both the observational and trial literature.
  • The longest trial duration was 2 years, and the mean was only 12.7 weeks.
  • The review covered young children aged 0-6 years specifically.

The overall methodological quality of included studies was mixed, with more than half rated as poor or fair.

  • Quality was rated as poor for 3 studies, fair for 9 studies, and good for 6 studies using the Downs and Black Checklist.
  • A total of 19 articles were quality-assessed.
  • The proportion of poor or fair quality studies was 12 out of 18 rated studies (the protocol was presumably not rated the same way).
  • The Downs and Black Checklist was the methodological quality assessment tool used.

The review concludes there is a need to identify strategies to prevent and reduce melatonin use in young children and to improve adherence by pediatricians to evidence-based practice standards.

  • The recommendation is driven by the global rise in prescriptions without efficacy data for typically developing children.
  • Pediatrician adherence to evidence-based practice standards is specifically cited as an area needing improvement.
  • The finding applies specifically to the age group 0-6 years.
  • The review authors frame this as a public health concern given rising overdose and prescribing trends.

What This Means

This research examined what is known about melatonin use in very young children (ages 0 to 6 years) by systematically reviewing nearly two decades of published studies. The researchers found that melatonin is now the leading cause of medication overdose in emergency rooms for this age group, and that prescriptions for melatonin have been rising sharply over the past decade. When they looked at clinical trials, they found that melatonin did help young children with neurological conditions like autism fall asleep more quickly, with few side effects — but all of this evidence came from children with diagnosed conditions, and the trials were generally short (averaging about 3 months). A critical gap the researchers identified is that there is no scientific evidence showing melatonin is effective or safe for typically developing young children who simply have trouble sleeping. Despite this, melatonin is being prescribed and used widely in this age group. The studies reviewed were also generally of modest methodological quality, meaning the overall evidence base is not strong. There were no data on what happens to children's health or behavior over the long term when they take melatonin regularly at this young age. This research suggests that the rapid increase in melatonin use in very young children is happening without the scientific backing to justify it for most of the children receiving it. The authors call for efforts to reduce unnecessary melatonin use in this population and for doctors to follow evidence-based guidelines more carefully. For parents and caregivers, the study highlights that while melatonin may help some children with specific neurological conditions under medical supervision, its broader use in young children lacks a solid evidence base and carries documented risks including accidental overdose.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Kracht C, Bolamperti G, Breeden R, Crocker M, Christifano D, Gibler R, et al.. (2026). Melatonin Use in Young Children: A Systematic Review.. JAMA network open. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.51958