Links between academic performance and mental health in adolescence are 'reciprocal yet domain-specific,' with externalizing problems showing clear bidirectional within-person associations with grades while internalizing symptoms showed no within- or between-person associations with grades.
Key Findings
Results
Externalizing problems showed clear bidirectional within-person links with academic grades across lower secondary school.
Lower-than-usual grades predicted subsequent increases in externalizing problems
This bidirectional pattern was found using both conventional cross-lagged panel models (CLPMs) and random-intercept CLPMs (RI-CLPMs)
Both modeling approaches 'yielded similar substantive conclusions'
Results
Internalizing symptoms showed no within- or between-person associations with academic grades.
Unlike externalizing problems, internalizing problems did not predict subsequent grades
Grades also did not predict subsequent internalizing symptoms
This null finding held at both within-person and between-person levels of analysis
Mental health was measured using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)
Results
The associations between externalizing problems and grades did not differ systematically across school years or by gender.
Multigroup models were used to examine gender differences
The sample was 48.3% boys
Associations were tested across grade 7 to grade 9 (ages 13-16) with mental health reassessed in grade 10
No systematic variation was found by transition year or gender subgroup
Methods
The study followed 3,473 Swedish lower secondary school pupils annually from grade 7 through grade 10.
Sample size was 3,473 pupils (48.3% boys)
Students were followed from grade 7 to grade 9, ages 13-16, in Swedish lower secondary school
Mental health was reassessed in grade 10, the first year of upper secondary school
Academic performance was measured by end-of-year subject grades
Self-reported data were used for mental health measurement via the SDQ
Methods
Both conventional cross-lagged panel models and random-intercept cross-lagged panel models produced substantively similar conclusions.
RI-CLPMs separate within-person fluctuations from stable between-person differences, providing a more rigorous test of within-person dynamics
The convergence of CLPMs and RI-CLPMs strengthens confidence in the domain-specific pattern of findings
The authors note that 'CLPMs and RI-CLPMs yielded similar substantive conclusions'
Conclusions
The authors conclude that behavior is more tightly coupled with academic grades than mood during adolescence.
The findings indicate 'not all facets of mental health, nor all aspects of performance, are equally responsive to one another'
The domain-specificity suggests that interventions targeting externalizing behavior may have academic as well as mental health benefits, and vice versa
The study covers the full span of Swedish lower secondary school (grades 7-9) plus the transition into upper secondary school (grade 10)
What This Means
This research suggests that the relationship between mental health and school performance during the teenage years is not a simple, uniform connection — it depends heavily on which type of mental health problem is involved. Researchers followed over 3,400 Swedish students from ages 13 to 16 (grades 7 through 9) and found that behavioral problems, such as acting out or having difficulty controlling behavior (called 'externalizing' problems), were linked to grades in a two-way fashion: students who had more behavioral problems than usual tended to get lower grades afterward, and students who got lower grades than usual tended to develop more behavioral problems afterward. This back-and-forth relationship held for both boys and girls and across all school years studied.
In contrast, emotional problems like anxiety and depression (called 'internalizing' problems) showed no meaningful connection to grades in either direction — worse emotional symptoms did not predict grade drops, and lower grades did not predict worsening emotional symptoms. This distinction held up even when the researchers used advanced statistical methods designed to isolate changes within individual students over time, rather than just comparing students who generally differ from one another.
This research suggests that when thinking about the link between school performance and teen mental health, it matters a great deal what kind of mental health issue is being considered. Behavioral problems and academic performance appear to reinforce each other in a cycle during the school years, while emotional distress like anxiety or low mood may operate more independently of grades. This distinction could be important for how schools and mental health professionals think about supporting struggling students, as addressing behavioral difficulties may have broader benefits for academic outcomes than addressing internalizing symptoms alone.
Bortes C, Högberg B. (2026). Mental health and academic performance in adolescence-Reciprocal links or not?. Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.70208