Sleep

Misperception of supine sleep in the sleep laboratory: a retrospective review of self-reported versus polysomnography-measured sleep position.

TL;DR

Patients denying supine sleep in the laboratory were more likely to misperceive sleep position on PSG, with younger females under-reporting supine sleep, and overall agreement between self-reported and polysomnography-measured sleep position was only moderate.

Key Findings

Overall agreement between self-reported and PSG-measured sleep position categories was only moderate.

  • Cohen's kappa statistic (linear weighting) = 0.45 (95% CI: 0.43, 0.48)
  • Categories compared were 'None/Some/Half/Most/All' based on percentage of total sleep time (%TST)
  • Cut-points used were 0, 2.5, 33.3, 66.6, 97.5, and 100% TST
  • Total sample size was 956 patient records from a retrospective review of a public sleep service

Patients who self-reported sleeping supine on the PSG night were highly accurate, but those who denied supine sleep were frequently incorrect.

  • 93% of patients who self-reported supine sleep were correct
  • Only 56% of those who denied supine sleep accurately reported the absence of supine sleep on PSG
  • Absence of supine sleep on PSG was defined as ≤2.5% TST
  • This asymmetry indicates that misperception was predominantly driven by under-reporting rather than over-reporting of supine sleep

Patients who reported not sleeping on their back during the PSG had significantly higher odds of sleep position misperception.

  • Odds ratio of 11.0 (95% CI: 7.0, 17.3) for misperception among those who denied supine sleep compared to those who reported supine sleep
  • p < .001
  • This finding suggests that self-denial of supine sleep is a strong predictor of inaccurate positional self-reporting

Younger patients and females were more likely to under-report supine sleep.

  • Patients younger than 55 years were more likely to under-report supine sleep
  • Female patients were more likely to under-report supine sleep
  • Younger females specifically were identified as the subgroup most prone to under-reporting supine sleep
  • These demographic factors were identified as contributors to supine sleep misperception

Body position was measured using a Grael position sensor with manual editing based on digital video when discrepant readings occurred.

  • The study used a retrospective review of clinical PSG records from a public sleep service
  • 956 patient records were available for analysis
  • Patients completed a sleep questionnaire including questions regarding sleep position during the PSG night
  • PSG-measured supine sleep was expressed as a percentage of total sleep time (%TST) and classified into the same 'None/Some/Half/Most/All' categories as self-report

Misperception of supine sleep position has clinical implications for PAP therapy implementation and positional therapy efficacy assessment.

  • Accuracy of patient-perceived sleeping position has implications for the acquisition and interpretation of sleep studies
  • Misperception may affect implementation of positive airway pressure (PAP) therapies
  • Misperception may affect determining efficacy of positional therapies at home
  • Understanding contributors to misperception 'may influence decisions regarding supine sleep sampling in the laboratory, as well as clinical decision making'

What This Means

This research suggests that people are not always accurate when reporting whether they sleep on their back (supine position) during a sleep study. The study examined nearly 1,000 patients at a sleep clinic and compared what they said about their sleeping position to what was actually recorded by sensors and video during their overnight sleep test. While people who said they did sleep on their back were almost always correct (93%), more than 4 in 10 people who said they did not sleep on their back actually did spend measurable time in that position — meaning they significantly underestimated their back-sleeping. Overall, the match between self-reported and objectively measured sleep positions was only 'moderate' by statistical standards. The study also found that certain groups of people were more prone to this misperception. Specifically, younger patients (under 55 years old) and women were more likely to underreport how much time they spent sleeping on their back. Patients who claimed they slept entirely off their back had 11 times greater odds of being wrong compared to those who acknowledged some back-sleeping. This research matters because sleep position affects the diagnosis and treatment of sleep disorders like obstructive sleep apnea, which is often worse when sleeping on the back. If patients or clinicians rely on self-reported sleep position to make decisions — such as whether a patient needs 'positional therapy' to avoid back-sleeping, or how to interpret a sleep study — inaccurate self-reporting could lead to suboptimal treatment choices. The findings suggest that clinicians should be cautious about taking patients' word alone when assessing back-sleeping, particularly in younger women.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Wilson D, Hollamby M, Skinner T, Hay K, Curtin D, Szollosi I. (2026). Misperception of supine sleep in the sleep laboratory: a retrospective review of self-reported versus polysomnography-measured sleep position.. Sleep &amp; breathing = Schlaf &amp; Atmung. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-025-03560-4