Mental Health

Modelling the effect of motivation on mental health components with fuzzy logic among elite athletes.

TL;DR

A Mamdani-type Fuzzy Inference System modelling intrinsic motivation, psychological safety, and mental well-being among 247 elite athletes demonstrated superior predictive accuracy over standard linear regression, revealing a primary risk gradient when all three inputs are low, buffering effects as protective factors increase, and a low-risk 'basin' when psychological safety and mental well-being are jointly high.

Key Findings

Psychological safety and mental well-being independently predicted lower risk across all mental health outcomes in elite athletes.

  • Sample consisted of 247 elite athletes completing validated measures including SMS-6 Intrinsic Motivation, Psychological Safety, SWEMWBS, GAD-7, PHQ-9, APSQ, and BMS.
  • Multiple regression analyses confirmed PS and MWB as significant negative predictors of anxiety, depression, athlete-specific strain, and burnout.
  • Results held across all four outcome measures assessed.

Intrinsic motivation emerged as a significant positive predictor of depression and anxiety, identified as a suppression effect.

  • IM was a statistically significant positive predictor of depression and anxiety (p < 0.05).
  • Further diagnostics confirmed this as a suppression effect rather than a direct causal relationship.
  • All variance inflation factor (VIF) values were < 1.5, ruling out multicollinearity as an explanation.
  • This finding was unexpected given typical assumptions about intrinsic motivation as a protective factor.

The Mamdani-type Fuzzy Inference System offered superior predictive accuracy and interpretability compared to standard linear regression approaches.

  • Comparative metrics including MAE and RMSE were used to evaluate model performance.
  • The FIS model used trapezoidal membership functions for boundary linguistic variables and triangular membership functions for intermediate categories.
  • The system utilized min-max aggregation and centroid defuzzification.
  • Rule weights and breakpoints were calibrated against observed score distributions to minimize mean absolute error (MAE).

The fuzzy logic model identified three consistent regularities in the relationship between motivational-psychological inputs and mental health risk.

  • Regularity (i): a primary risk gradient when intrinsic motivation, psychological safety, and mental well-being are all low.
  • Regularity (ii): a buffering effect as psychological safety or mental well-being increase.
  • Regularity (iii): a low-risk 'basin' when psychological safety and mental well-being are jointly high.
  • These regularities were confirmed through both visual and quantitative analyses.

The fuzzy inference system was constructed with a transparent rule base capturing primary risk and protective mechanisms among elite athletes.

  • The rule base specified primary risk arising from low intrinsic motivation.
  • Protection was modeled from psychological safety and mental well-being individually.
  • Synergistic protection was modeled when both psychological safety and mental well-being are high simultaneously.
  • The Mamdani-type FIS was chosen to accurately represent non-linear transitions between psychological states.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

&#x15e;enel A, Adilo&#x11f;ullar&#x131; G, &#x15e;enel E. (2026). Modelling the effect of motivation on mental health components with fuzzy logic among elite athletes.. Scientific reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-39718-7