A Mamdani-type Fuzzy Inference System modelling intrinsic motivation, psychological safety, and mental well-being among 247 elite athletes demonstrated superior predictive accuracy over standard linear regression, revealing a primary risk gradient when all three inputs are low, buffering effects as protective factors increase, and a low-risk 'basin' when psychological safety and mental well-being are jointly high.
Key Findings
Results
Psychological safety and mental well-being independently predicted lower risk across all mental health outcomes in elite athletes.
Sample consisted of 247 elite athletes completing validated measures including SMS-6 Intrinsic Motivation, Psychological Safety, SWEMWBS, GAD-7, PHQ-9, APSQ, and BMS.
Multiple regression analyses confirmed PS and MWB as significant negative predictors of anxiety, depression, athlete-specific strain, and burnout.
Results held across all four outcome measures assessed.
Results
Intrinsic motivation emerged as a significant positive predictor of depression and anxiety, identified as a suppression effect.
IM was a statistically significant positive predictor of depression and anxiety (p < 0.05).
Further diagnostics confirmed this as a suppression effect rather than a direct causal relationship.
All variance inflation factor (VIF) values were < 1.5, ruling out multicollinearity as an explanation.
This finding was unexpected given typical assumptions about intrinsic motivation as a protective factor.
Results
The Mamdani-type Fuzzy Inference System offered superior predictive accuracy and interpretability compared to standard linear regression approaches.
Comparative metrics including MAE and RMSE were used to evaluate model performance.
The FIS model used trapezoidal membership functions for boundary linguistic variables and triangular membership functions for intermediate categories.
The system utilized min-max aggregation and centroid defuzzification.
Rule weights and breakpoints were calibrated against observed score distributions to minimize mean absolute error (MAE).
Results
The fuzzy logic model identified three consistent regularities in the relationship between motivational-psychological inputs and mental health risk.
Regularity (i): a primary risk gradient when intrinsic motivation, psychological safety, and mental well-being are all low.
Regularity (ii): a buffering effect as psychological safety or mental well-being increase.
Regularity (iii): a low-risk 'basin' when psychological safety and mental well-being are jointly high.
These regularities were confirmed through both visual and quantitative analyses.
Methods
The fuzzy inference system was constructed with a transparent rule base capturing primary risk and protective mechanisms among elite athletes.
The rule base specified primary risk arising from low intrinsic motivation.
Protection was modeled from psychological safety and mental well-being individually.
Synergistic protection was modeled when both psychological safety and mental well-being are high simultaneously.
The Mamdani-type FIS was chosen to accurately represent non-linear transitions between psychological states.
Şenel A, Adiloğulları G, Şenel E. (2026). Modelling the effect of motivation on mental health components with fuzzy logic among elite athletes.. Scientific reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-39718-7