Cardiovascular

Multimodal Artificial Intelligence Model Integrating Chest CT and Cardiac Ultrasound for the Auxiliary Diagnosis of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

TL;DR

In this internal retrospective evaluation of 100 patients with suspected PAH, a multimodal AI model integrating chest CT and echocardiography showed improved overall discrimination versus CT or echocardiography alone (against right heart catheterization), and should be considered an auxiliary, noninvasive tool requiring external prospective validation.

Key Findings

The multimodal AI model achieved high diagnostic performance for PAH against right heart catheterization as the reference standard.

  • Sensitivity 92.2%, specificity 88.9%, accuracy 91.0%, and AUC 0.930.
  • The model integrated imaging-derived structural and functional features from chest CT and echocardiography within an attention-based multimodal AI framework.
  • Evaluation was an internal retrospective analysis, not an external validation.

Chest CT alone had lower diagnostic performance than the multimodal AI model.

  • CT sensitivity 84.4%, specificity 80.6%, accuracy 83.0%, AUC 0.860.
  • McNemar test of paired binary classifications favored AI over CT (p = 0.0078).

Echocardiography alone had the lowest diagnostic performance of the three approaches.

  • Echocardiography sensitivity 79.7%, specificity 77.8%, accuracy 79.0%, AUC 0.840.
  • McNemar test favored AI over echocardiography (p = 0.00049).

The study used a small single-cohort retrospective design with all three tests performed within a short interval.

  • 100 patients with suspected PAH (mean age 52.6 ± 15.2 years; 56% female), January 2020 to December 2024.
  • Each patient underwent high-resolution chest CT, transthoracic echocardiography, and RHC within a 2-week interval.
  • Metrics were calculated against the archived RHC clinical classification.

Exploratory subgroup analyses were performed for borderline pulmonary artery diameter and connective tissue disease.

  • The abstract describes these analyses as exploratory.
  • No subgroup results are reported in the abstract.

The authors conclude the multimodal approach is an auxiliary noninvasive tool needing external prospective validation.

  • Improved overall discrimination was seen in an internal retrospective evaluation.
  • CT and echocardiography are described as complementary but with incomplete sensitivity and specificity when used alone.

What This Means

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a serious condition in which blood pressure in the lung arteries is too high, straining the right side of the heart. The standard way to confirm it is right heart catheterization, an invasive procedure. Chest CT and heart ultrasound are noninvasive but each misses some cases or gives false alarms when used alone. This study looked back at 100 patients with suspected PAH who had a chest CT, a heart ultrasound, and catheterization within two weeks of each other. Researchers built an AI model that combined information from both images and compared it with each test alone, using catheterization as the reference. The AI correctly identified PAH in about 92% of those who had it and correctly ruled it out in about 89% of those who did not, with overall accuracy of 91%. CT alone had 83% accuracy and ultrasound alone had 79%. Statistical tests showed the AI's classifications differed significantly from both. This research suggests that combining imaging types with AI could help support noninvasive PAH diagnosis. However, the study was small, retrospective, and tested the model only on internal data, so the results may not hold in other hospitals or patient groups. The authors state that the tool should be considered only an auxiliary aid and needs external, prospective testing before it could be relied on in practice.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Sun Z, Liu F. (2026). Multimodal Artificial Intelligence Model Integrating Chest CT and Cardiac Ultrasound for the Auxiliary Diagnosis of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.. Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE. https://doi.org/10.3791/72551