Using propensity score matching-difference in differences, this study found that individuals whose close relative or family member suffered a serious injury or illness had significantly lower mental health scores and higher odds of being time stressed compared to unexposed individuals, with effects persisting up to six years post-onset.
Key Findings
Results
Having a close relative or family member suffer a serious injury or illness was associated with significantly lower mental health scores in the exposed group compared to the unexposed group.
Data were sourced from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey, a longitudinal cohort of Australian adults.
A propensity score matching-difference in differences (PSM-DiD) identification approach was used to address both observable and unobservable selection bias.
The mental health effects were more pronounced among females compared to males.
The mental health effects set in after two years post-onset of the injury or illness.
Results
Individuals in the exposed group had higher odds of being time stressed compared to the unexposed group.
Time stress started contemporaneously with the onset of the family member's injury or illness.
Time stress persisted through to the sixth-year post-injury or illness.
Males were more time stressed than females following a family member's serious injury or illness.
The PSM-DiD approach was used to isolate the causal effect from selection bias.
Results
The mental health effects of a family member's serious injury or illness were more pronounced among individuals with low social capital.
Further analyses examined heterogeneity by social capital levels.
Those with low social capital experienced more pronounced mental health deterioration compared to those with higher social capital.
This finding suggests social capital moderates the spillover mental health effects of a family member's illness or injury.
Discussion
The burden of illness extends beyond the affected individual, producing spillover mental health effects on close family members.
The biobehavioral family model, which posits that an individual's biobehavioral reactivity is influenced by their family's health, provided the theoretical framework.
The authors argue that evaluations of illness impact should consider spillover effects including health losses to close family members.
Social support packages designed to improve a person's health recovery post-injury or illness should account for potential unintended health losses to close relatives.
Ignoring these spillover impacts 'could lead to sub-optimal outcomes for families and society.'
Afoakwah C, Koomson I, Brain D, McPhail S, Kuwornu J. (2026). My family member's health and my mental health: A longitudinal matched cohort study.. Social science & medicine (1982). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.118959