Cardiovascular

Natriuretic Peptides as Predictors for the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Hypertension Secondary to Left Heart Disease and for the Assessment of Its Severity.

TL;DR

Measurement of plasma natriuretic peptides may support PH screening in HFrEF, but their limited ability to detect severe precapillary component confirms RHC as the definitive tool for hemodynamic phenotyping.

Key Findings

Pulmonary hypertension was present in 443 out of 563 HFrEF patients who underwent right heart catheterization.

  • PH prevalence was 78.7% in the study cohort
  • The study population was predominantly male (84.5%, n=476), with 15.5% female (n=87)
  • Median age was 55 years and median ejection fraction was 20%
  • The study was a retrospective analysis of HFrEF patients who underwent RHC

Patients with PH had significantly higher BNP and NT-proBNP levels compared to those without PH.

  • BNP was significantly higher in PH patients (p < 0.001)
  • NT-proBNP was significantly higher in PH patients (p < 0.001)
  • PH patients also had higher NYHA class (p < 0.001) and lower ejection fraction (p < 0.001)
  • These differences were identified by comparing PH and non-PH groups across the 563-patient cohort

Increases in PH risk and hemodynamic parameters were associated with rising BNP up to approximately 500 pg/mL and NT-proBNP up to approximately 3000 pg/mL.

  • Increase in PH risk was associated with BNP increases up to ~500 pg/mL and NT-proBNP up to ~3000 pg/mL (p < 0.001)
  • Mean pulmonary artery pressure increased with rising natriuretic peptides up to these thresholds (p < 0.001)
  • Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) increased with rising natriuretic peptides up to these thresholds (p < 0.001)
  • Pulmonary arterial wedge pressure increased with rising natriuretic peptides up to these thresholds (p < 0.001)
  • Cardiac index decreased with rising natriuretic peptides up to these thresholds (p < 0.001); associations were assessed using restricted cubic splines

BNP and NT-proBNP were independent predictors of PH and PVR greater than 5 Wood units.

  • Both BNP and NT-proBNP were identified as independent predictors via logistic regression
  • Prediction of PH: BNP achieved AUC 0.798 and NT-proBNP achieved AUC 0.727
  • Prediction of PVR > 5 Wood units: BNP AUC 0.661 and NT-proBNP AUC 0.664
  • Prediction of cardiac index < 2.0 L/min/m²: BNP AUC 0.607 and NT-proBNP AUC 0.623
  • ROC curve analysis was used to assess predictive accuracy for all outcomes

Natriuretic peptides predicted the presence of PH with moderate accuracy but were less accurate for identifying severe precapillary hemodynamic components.

  • BNP predicted PH with AUC 0.798, which was the highest predictive accuracy observed across all outcomes
  • Accuracy for PVR > 5 Wood units (AUC 0.661–0.664) and cardiac index < 2.0 L/min/m² (AUC 0.607–0.623) was substantially lower
  • The limited ability to detect severe precapillary components was highlighted as a key limitation of natriuretic peptide-based screening
  • The authors concluded that RHC remains the definitive tool for hemodynamic phenotyping

What This Means

This research investigated whether two blood biomarkers — BNP and NT-proBNP, which are proteins released by the heart under stress — could help identify pulmonary hypertension (high blood pressure in the lungs) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The study looked back at records from 563 such patients who had all undergone right heart catheterization (RHC), the gold-standard but invasive procedure for diagnosing this condition. Nearly 79% of these patients had pulmonary hypertension, and those who did had significantly higher levels of both biomarkers. The study found that both BNP and NT-proBNP could predict whether a patient had pulmonary hypertension with moderate accuracy — BNP performed better (AUC 0.798) than NT-proBNP (AUC 0.727). However, both biomarkers were much less accurate at identifying patients with more severe forms of the disease, specifically those with high pulmonary vascular resistance (a marker of vascular remodeling) or very low cardiac output. The association between rising biomarker levels and worsening lung pressures appeared to plateau around 500 pg/mL for BNP and 3000 pg/mL for NT-proBNP, suggesting diminishing informational value at very high levels. This research suggests that measuring natriuretic peptides in the blood could help doctors decide which heart failure patients need further invasive testing for pulmonary hypertension, potentially prioritizing higher-risk individuals for catheterization. However, because these biomarkers cannot reliably distinguish the most severe or complex forms of the disease, they cannot replace invasive right heart catheterization for fully characterizing a patient's hemodynamic status. The findings support a role for these biomarkers as a screening tool, not a diagnostic replacement.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Sawczak F, Kukfisz A, Soloch A, Kurkiewicz-Sawczak K, Dudek M, Straburzy&#x144;ska-Migaj E, et al.. (2026). Natriuretic Peptides as Predictors for the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Hypertension Secondary to Left Heart Disease and for the Assessment of Its Severity.. International journal of molecular sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27177776