Cardiovascular

Nomogram for predicting post-percutaneous coronary intervention restenosis in patients with coronary artery disease and diabetes: a retrospective study.

TL;DR

A nomogram prediction model incorporating HbA1c, IGF-I, LDL-C, TNF-α, hsCRP, stent type, post-procedural percentage diameter stenosis, and calcium antagonist use demonstrated good discrimination for post-PCI restenosis in CAD patients with T2DM, with an apparent AUC of 0.833 and bootstrap-corrected AUC of 0.808.

Key Findings

Lower HbA1c levels were significantly associated with post-PCI restenosis in CAD patients with T2DM.

  • Spearman correlation: rho = -0.142, P = 0.008
  • Logistic regression: OR = 0.767, 95% CI [0.625–0.941]
  • This inverse relationship suggests that lower HbA1c was paradoxically associated with restenosis in this cohort
  • Study included 272 patients: 121 in restenosis group and 151 in non-restenosis group

Higher IGF-I levels were significantly associated with increased risk of post-PCI restenosis.

  • Spearman correlation: rho = 0.328, P < 0.001 (strongest correlation among the biomarkers evaluated)
  • Logistic regression: OR = 1.053, 95% CI [1.032–1.075]
  • IGF-I had the largest correlation coefficient among the serum metabolites tested

Higher LDL-C levels were significantly associated with increased risk of post-PCI restenosis.

  • Pearson correlation: r = 0.135, P = 0.025
  • Logistic regression: OR = 1.682, 95% CI [1.107–2.555]
  • LDL-C was included as an independent predictor in the final nomogram model

Higher TNF-α levels were significantly associated with increased risk of post-PCI restenosis.

  • Pearson correlation: r = 0.172, P = 0.004
  • Logistic regression: OR = 1.434, 95% CI [1.119–1.838]
  • TNF-α was identified as an inflammatory biomarker predictor in the nomogram

Higher hsCRP levels were significantly associated with increased risk of post-PCI restenosis.

  • Pearson correlation: r = 0.179, P = 0.003
  • Logistic regression: OR = 1.786, 95% CI [1.185–2.693]
  • hsCRP had the highest OR among the inflammatory markers evaluated

Use of non-drug-eluting stents (non-DES) was associated with increased risk of post-PCI restenosis.

  • Non-DES stent type was identified as an independent predictor of restenosis in logistic regression
  • Non-DES was included as a significant procedure-related variable in the nomogram model
  • The finding is consistent with established evidence that bare-metal stents carry higher restenosis risk than drug-eluting stents

Higher post-procedural percentage diameter stenosis (%DS) was associated with increased risk of post-PCI restenosis.

  • %DS was identified as a significant procedure-related predictor in logistic regression
  • %DS was incorporated as one of the eight predictors in the final nomogram model
  • This reflects the contribution of residual stenosis immediately after PCI to subsequent restenosis risk

Use of calcium antagonists was negatively associated with post-PCI restenosis.

  • Pearson correlation: r = -0.185, P = 0.002
  • Logistic regression: OR = 0.449, 95% CI [0.228–0.884]
  • Calcium antagonist use was the only medication variable significantly associated with reduced restenosis risk
  • Calcium antagonist use was included as a protective factor in the final nomogram

The nomogram prediction model demonstrated good discrimination for post-PCI restenosis.

  • Apparent AUC = 0.833
  • Bootstrap-corrected AUC = 0.808, indicating good internal validity after correction for optimism
  • Internal validation was performed using bootstrap resampling
  • The model incorporated eight predictors: HbA1c, IGF-I, LDL-C, TNF-α, hsCRP, stent type, %DS, and calcium antagonist use

The study was a retrospective case-control analysis of 272 CAD patients with T2DM who underwent PCI between January 2020 and June 2023.

  • Patients were divided into restenosis group (n = 121) and non-restenosis group (n = 151) based on one-year angiographic follow-up
  • Restenosis classification was based on angiographic evidence at one-year follow-up
  • Predictors were identified through logistic regression and correlation analysis
  • The study was retrospective in design, limiting causal inference

The authors noted that external validation of the nomogram is pending and that the model may serve as an exploratory tool for risk stratification.

  • The study authors stated the model 'may provide a useful exploratory tool to support risk stratification and inform management aimed at reducing the restenosis burden in high-risk cardiovascular populations'
  • External validation has not yet been conducted
  • The retrospective, single-center design is a limitation noted by the authors

What This Means

This research suggests that several blood markers and procedural factors can help predict whether patients with both heart disease (coronary artery disease) and type 2 diabetes will develop restenosis — a re-narrowing of the artery — within one year after undergoing a procedure called percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI, or stenting). The study followed 272 such patients and found that higher levels of IGF-I (a growth factor), LDL cholesterol (so-called 'bad' cholesterol), TNF-α and hsCRP (markers of inflammation), and greater residual artery narrowing after the procedure were all linked to a higher chance of restenosis. Interestingly, lower HbA1c (a measure of average blood sugar control) was also associated with restenosis, which is an unexpected finding the authors noted. Additionally, patients who received older-style stents (non-drug-eluting stents) had higher restenosis risk, while those taking a class of blood pressure medications called calcium antagonists had lower risk. Using these eight factors, the researchers built a visual prediction tool called a nomogram that could estimate an individual patient's probability of restenosis. When tested internally using a statistical technique called bootstrap resampling, the model performed well, correctly distinguishing between patients who did and did not develop restenosis about 81% of the time (corrected AUC = 0.808). This research suggests that combining specific blood biomarkers with information about the stenting procedure and medications could help clinicians identify diabetic heart disease patients who are at higher risk of restenosis after PCI. However, the study was conducted at a single center, looked back at past records, and has not yet been tested in an independent patient population, so the authors caution that external validation is needed before the tool could be more broadly applied in clinical practice.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Wang P, Peng H, Fan Q, Shan Y, Yin N. (2026). Nomogram for predicting post-percutaneous coronary intervention restenosis in patients with coronary artery disease and diabetes: a retrospective study.. PeerJ. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.21697