Cardiovascular

Patient Self-Monitoring of Peripheral Intravenous Catheters Using the Visual Infusion Phlebitis Score: A Pilot Study.

TL;DR

Patients of all ages ≥18 years to >70 years applied their knowledge of the VIP score for accurate assessment and monitoring of their PIVCs for visual signs of phlebitis, with findings that could guide innovative clinical practice developments in safe PIVC care.

Key Findings

Patient knowledge of using the VIP score for PIVC self-monitoring was statistically significant on day 1 and day 2 after PIVC insertion, but not on day 3.

  • Statistical significance was found on day 1 (P < .015) and day 2 (P < .037) of hospitalization.
  • Day 3 results did not reach statistical significance.
  • Knowledge was assessed using a structured Patient Knowledge Evaluation Questionnaire (PKEQ).
  • Patients received education on using the VIP score after admission.

Patients' accuracy of VIP score scoring was comparable with nurses' scores.

  • Patient-assigned phlebitis scores were compared against nurse-assigned scores.
  • The study used the Visual Infusion Phlebitis (VIP) score as the standardized assessment tool.
  • This comparison was made across the study population of 64 inpatients.

Major in-hospital adverse events were not statistically different between younger and older participant age groups.

  • The study compared younger participants (aged ≥18 years to <70 years) and older participants (aged >70 years).
  • Major adverse events were tracked across both groups during hospitalization.
  • No statistically significant difference in major adverse events was found between the two age groups.

Patients across all age groups (≥18 years to >70 years) were able to apply VIP score knowledge for accurate PIVC assessment and monitoring.

  • The study enrolled 64 inpatients aged ≥18 years.
  • Both younger (≥18 to <70 years) and older (>70 years) participants demonstrated ability to use the VIP score.
  • Patients monitored for visual signs of phlebitis related to peripheral intravenous catheters.
  • The study design was a descriptive comparative pilot study conducted over 3 days of hospitalization.

A structured Patient Knowledge Evaluation Questionnaire (PKEQ) was used to evaluate patient knowledge of VIP score use on days 1, 2, and 3 of hospitalization.

  • The PKEQ was administered at three time points: days 1, 2, and 3 after PIVC insertion.
  • 64 inpatients aged ≥18 years were enrolled in the study.
  • Patient education on the VIP score was delivered after hospital admission.
  • The study used a descriptive comparative design to compare knowledge and outcomes between age groups.

What This Means

This research suggests that hospital patients can be taught to monitor their own intravenous (IV) catheter sites for early signs of a complication called phlebitis — inflammation of a vein — using a standardized visual checklist called the Visual Infusion Phlebitis (VIP) score. In this pilot study of 64 hospitalized adults, patients received brief education on how to use the VIP score after admission, and their self-assessments were found to be comparable in accuracy to those made by nurses. Knowledge levels were significantly higher on the first and second days after IV catheter insertion, suggesting that education delivered close to the time of insertion may be particularly effective. Importantly, patients of all ages — including those over 70 years old — were able to learn and apply the VIP score to accurately check their own IV sites for visual warning signs such as redness, swelling, or pain. There were no significant differences in serious adverse events between younger and older patient groups, suggesting that age alone was not a barrier to participating in this type of self-monitoring. This research suggests that engaging patients in monitoring their own IV catheters could be a practical and safe way to support earlier detection of IV-related complications in hospital settings. Involving patients as active participants in their own care may complement nursing surveillance and potentially reduce harm from undetected IV site problems, though larger studies would be needed to confirm these findings more broadly.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Soo Hoo S, Uy J, McDade A, Hyun J, Aguiba K, Waite M, et al.. (2026). Patient Self-Monitoring of Peripheral Intravenous Catheters Using the Visual Infusion Phlebitis Score: A Pilot Study.. Journal of infusion nursing : the official publication of the Infusion Nurses Society. https://doi.org/10.1097/NAN.0000000000000655