Perceptual stabilization is weaker in older adults and correlates with spatial suppression of motion, providing behavioral evidence that these two mechanisms are linked and may reflect shared motion-processing mechanisms that weaken with age.
Key Findings
Results
Older adults exhibited weaker spatial suppression of motion than younger adults.
34 younger adults (aged 19-35 years) and 34 older adults (aged 60-80 years) were tested
Spatial suppression strength was measured using a motion direction discrimination task
A suppression index was derived from duration thresholds for a large stimulus presented at high and low contrast
Weaker spatial suppression in older adults is consistent with previous work cited in the study
Results
Older adults exhibited weaker perceptual stabilization of fixational eye movements than younger adults.
Perceptual stabilization was assessed via a motion speed discrimination task
A stabilization index was derived by comparing conditions that preserved versus disrupted stabilization
This finding was predicted on the basis that spatial suppression is known to be weaker in older adults
Both age groups (34 younger, 34 older adults) were compared on this measure
Results
The suppression index was positively correlated with the stabilization index across all participants.
The correlation was observed across both age groups combined
This relationship provides behavioral evidence that spatial suppression of motion and perceptual stabilization are linked
The authors interpret this as suggesting shared motion-processing mechanisms underlie both phenomena
The correlation held despite the two tasks measuring distinct aspects of motion processing
Results
Fixation stability did not differ between younger and older adults.
Fixation stability was directly assessed in both age groups as part of the study
No significant difference in fixational eye movement stability was found between groups
This finding rules out the explanation that older adults have weaker perceptual stabilization simply because of poorer fixation
The result suggests the reduced perceptual stabilization in older adults reflects differences in motion processing rather than differences in eye movement behavior
Background
Spatial suppression and perceptual stabilization are two distinct motion processing mechanisms that both reduce the influence of redundant motion signals.
Spatial suppression reduces sensitivity to large, uniform background motion
Perceptual stabilization compensates for global retinal motion arising from involuntary eye movements during fixation
Prior to this study, it was unclear whether these two mechanisms were behaviorally related
Both mechanisms are described as functioning to 'enhance behaviorally relevant motion'
What This Means
This research suggests that two different ways the brain filters out unhelpful motion information — one that reduces sensitivity to large background motion (called spatial suppression) and one that compensates for the eye's own tiny involuntary movements during fixation (called perceptual stabilization) — are linked to each other and both become weaker as people age. The study tested 34 younger adults (ages 19–35) and 34 older adults (ages 60–80) on separate tasks measuring each of these abilities, and found that people who were better at one tended to be better at the other, regardless of age group. Older adults scored lower on both measures compared to younger adults.
Importantly, the researchers also measured how steady participants could hold their gaze (fixation stability) and found no difference between the age groups. This means the older adults' weaker perceptual stabilization was not simply because their eyes moved around more — instead, it appears their brains were less effective at processing and compensating for eye movement-related motion signals. This points to a shared underlying neural mechanism for both functions that declines with age.
This research suggests that age-related changes in motion perception may be broader and more interconnected than previously understood, affecting multiple aspects of how the visual system handles motion at once. Understanding these links could eventually help explain why older adults sometimes have more difficulty in visually complex or moving environments, and may inform future research into the neural basis of motion processing across the lifespan.
Nandagopal P, McKendrick A, Anderson A. (2026). Perceptual stabilization is weaker in older adults and correlates with spatial suppression of motion.. Journal of vision. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.26.10.15