Aging & Longevity

Physical frailty, self-rated health, and all-cause mortality: implications for understanding resilience in aging.

TL;DR

Physical frailty and self-rated health, while related, capture distinct aspects of health, each independently and jointly predicting all-cause mortality, with SRH retaining prognostic value even among frail individuals.

Key Findings

Frailty and pre-frailty were independently associated with increased hazard of all-cause mortality after adjusting for self-rated health.

  • Pre-frailty was associated with a 1.4-fold increased hazard of mortality compared to non-frail participants (p < .001)
  • Frailty was associated with a 2.0-fold increased hazard of mortality compared to non-frail participants (p < .001)
  • These associations were independent of self-rated health, demographic characteristics, and comorbidities
  • Sensitivity analyses excluding participants with probable or possible dementia at baseline yielded similar results

Self-rated health was independently associated with all-cause mortality after adjusting for physical frailty status.

  • Reporting good SRH was associated with 29% higher hazard of mortality compared to excellent/very good SRH after adjusting for frailty (p < .001)
  • Reporting fair/poor SRH was associated with 59% higher hazard of mortality compared to excellent/very good SRH after adjusting for frailty (p < .001)
  • These associations were independent of frailty status, demographic characteristics, and comorbidities

Fair/poor self-rated health was associated with higher mortality specifically among frail older adults, indicating SRH retains prognostic value within the frail subgroup.

  • The joint analysis showed fair/poor SRH was associated with higher mortality among the frail
  • This finding suggests SRH captures health dimensions not fully captured by physical frailty assessment alone
  • Sensitivity analyses excluding participants with dementia yielded similar results

Although frailty and poor self-rated health were positively correlated, a substantial proportion of participants showed discordance between the two measures.

  • 14% of the 7425 baseline participants were physically frail
  • 25% of participants reported fair/poor SRH
  • 12% of frail participants reported excellent/very good health
  • 6.6% of those with fair/poor SRH were non-frail
  • These discordant cases suggest frailty and SRH capture distinct aspects of health status

The study sample experienced substantial all-cause mortality over the follow-up period.

  • The study leveraged the National Health and Aging Trends Study of US Medicare beneficiaries followed annually from 2011 to 2019
  • Baseline sample consisted of 7425 participants
  • Median follow-up was 4.3 years
  • 29% of participants died over the follow-up period

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Sekhon V, Wani R, Wu C, Chu N, Xue Q. (2026). Physical frailty, self-rated health, and all-cause mortality: implications for understanding resilience in aging.. The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glag067