Pulsed-field ablation induces substantial myocardial biomarker release that scales with procedural intensity, but renal biomarkers remain stable, demonstrating 'robust but targeted myocardial injury and preserved renal safety.'
Key Findings
Results
Troponin-T increased significantly from near-zero baseline values to markedly elevated levels immediately and 24 hours after PFA procedure.
Repeated-measures ANOVA demonstrated significant time effects for troponin-T (p < 0.001)
Significant interactions were found between troponin-T levels and ablation burden
The study cohort consisted of 52 patients (73% men, 27% women)
52% had paroxysmal AF and 48% had persistent AF
Mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 55 ± 7%
Results
CK and CK-MB rose several-fold following PFA with only partial decline observed after the procedure.
Repeated-measures ANOVA demonstrated significant time effects for CK and CK-MB (p < 0.001)
Significant interactions were found between CK/CK-MB levels and ablation burden
Unlike troponin-T, CK and CK-MB showed only partial (not full) decline in the post-procedural measurement period
Mean ablation burden was 67 ± 23 applications per procedure
Results
The number of PFA applications correlated positively with late CK and CK-MB values, indicating that myocardial biomarker load scales with procedural intensity.
Positive correlation was observed between ablation application count and late post-procedural CK values
Positive correlation was also observed between ablation application count and late post-procedural CK-MB values
Mean ablation burden was 67 ± 23 applications per procedure
This relationship suggests a dose-response pattern between procedural intensity and myocardial biomarker release
Results
Renal biomarkers urea and creatinine remained stable throughout the procedure, indicating preserved renal function without acute kidney injury.
Both urea and creatinine were measured before and after ablation
No significant changes in renal biomarkers were detected, in contrast to the marked changes seen in myocardial markers
The findings indicate absence of acute kidney injury following PFA
Mean left atrial diameter was 45 ± 7 mm in the study cohort
Results
Substantial biochemical myocardial injury induced by PFA does not translate into measurable renal dysfunction.
The study concurrently analyzed both myocardial (troponin-T, CK, CK-MB) and renal (urea, creatinine) markers
Myocardial markers showed marked elevation while renal markers remained stable
This dissociation supports the characterization of PFA as having 'myocardial selectivity and reduced collateral tissue injury'
Findings align with current literature showing 'extensive myocardial biorelease after PFA but favorable extracardiac safety'
What This Means
This research suggests that pulsed-field ablation (PFA), a newer technique used to treat atrial fibrillation (an irregular heart rhythm) by electrically isolating problem areas in the heart, causes a predictable and measurable release of heart muscle proteins into the bloodstream. In a study of 52 patients, markers of heart muscle stress — troponin-T, CK, and CK-MB — all rose significantly during and after the procedure, with levels that were higher in patients who received more energy applications. This is consistent with the known mechanism of PFA, which works by destroying targeted heart tissue using electrical pulses.
Importantly, the kidneys appeared unaffected by the procedure. Kidney function markers (urea and creatinine) stayed stable before and after PFA, suggesting that despite the significant cardiac biomarker release, there was no spillover injury to the kidneys. This is particularly relevant because some older ablation methods can carry risks of collateral damage to nearby tissues.
This research suggests that PFA produces a pattern of substantial but localized heart tissue injury — enough to disrupt the abnormal electrical signals causing atrial fibrillation — while leaving other organ systems, such as the kidneys, unharmed. The finding that biomarker levels rise in proportion to the number of energy applications may help clinicians understand and anticipate the biochemical response to the procedure, though the clinical significance of the biomarker elevations themselves remains an area for further study.